The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spousal Alternatives and Marital Dissolution
Abstract
The authors draw on three different data sources to explore the effects of the quantity and quality of potential remarriage partners available in the local marriage market on the risk of marital dissolution. First data from the National Survey of Families and Households are used to demonstrate that among recently-divorced couples a substantial percentage of husbands and wives had been romantically involved with someone other than their spouse prior to divorcing. Then microlevel data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth are merged with aggregated Public Use Microdata from the US census to examine directly the impact of marriage market characteristics and other contextual variables on the risk of marital disruption net of conventional individual-level predictors of divorce. Proportional hazards regression models reveal that among nonhispanic Whites the risk of dissolution is highest where either wives or husbands encounter abundant alternatives to their current spouse. The labor force participation rate of unmarried women and the rate of geographic mobility in the local marriage market also decrease marital stability. In general the results suggest that many persons continue the marital search even while married and that the distribution of spousal alternatives embedded in the social structure influences significantly the risk of marital dissolution. (authors)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“South and Lloyd (1995) report that at in at least one third of US divorce cases, one or both partners had been romantically or sexually involved with someone outside the relationship prior to marriage breakdown.”
From Natural Selection, Childrearing, and the Ethics of Marriage (and Divorce): Building a Case for the Neuroenhancement of Human Relationships (2012) · cites this paper as South and Lloyd 1995
Citations
Cites
Wilson, W. J. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429501531-11 · Cited by 3,540
Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure
Blau, P. M. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,792
An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability
Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260631 · Cited by 1,715
Event History Analysis : Regression for Longitudinal Event Data
Allison, P. D. (1984) · Cited by 1,711
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229030 · Cited by 1,367
Linking Economic Hardship to Marital Quality and Instability
Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., Huck, S. M., & Melby, J. N. (1990) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352931 · Cited by 808
Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage.
Rueschemeyer, M., & Cherlin, A. J. (1983) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578169 · Cited by 778
The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households.
Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1988) · Cited by 698
Race and the Retreat From Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?
Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart, G. C., & Landry, D. J. (1992) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096123 · Cited by 569
Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question
McDaniel, S. A., Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1985) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340356 · Cited by 564
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–303 of 303
Vidal‐Meliá, C. (2026) · Family Transitions · doi:10.1080/28375300.2026.2724728
Marital Enhancement, Adulthood
Liu, C. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0195-4_99
Bioecological Exchange Theory: Trading Resources for Childcare in Mate Selection
Valentine, K. A. (2015) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Metadata
- Authors
- South, S. J., & Lloyd, K. M.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- ORCID
- South, Scott J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052033644
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 41.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- divorce, marriage market, remarriage, marital stability, spatial mobility, social structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review