Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order

Walder, Andrew G.·1995·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Les partis communistes ont eu tendance a offrir des possibilites de carriere a leurs membres les plus loyaux et cela dans le but de garantir le conformisme et la discipline. L'A. note que l'on n'a pas etudie le mecanisme de la recompense politique. Il propose une analyse du cas de la Chine. Il montre l'existence de deux types distincts de carriere qui divise l'elite du parti. Le premier necessite des competences politiques et un haut niveau d'instruction et conduit aux carrieres administratives. Le second necessite un haut niveau d'instruction mais de faible competences politiques et conduit aux postes de prestige denues de tout pouvoir

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096416

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Walder, A. G.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1995-06
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
309
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044080783
Cited by
420
References
0
FWCI
41.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2096416
The paper
Walder, A. G. (1995). Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096416

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.