The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives
Abstract
This study analyzes the decisions of members of the House on whether to seek higher office (governor or senator) during the period 1954-1974. It differs from previous ambition analyses in that it offers a more concrete theoretical base for the study of progressive ambition and it attempts to predict which members will seek higher office rather than just analyze the careers of members who did run. Hypotheses are offered which deal with the probability of winning a higher office, the value of the higher office, the value of the present office, and the impact of whether or not members are risk-takers. These hypotheses are then tested. Finally, a number of other hypotheses which follow from the theory are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition
FOX, R. L., & LAWLESS, J. L. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000227 · Cited by 385
MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics
EGGERS, A. C., & HAINMUELLER, J. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409990190 · Cited by 318
Ambition, federalism, and legislative politics in Brazil
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1193 · Cited by 290
When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House
MAESTAS, C. D., FULTON, S., MAISEL, L. S., & STONE, W. J. (2006) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055406062101 · Cited by 274
Leech, B. L. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohde, D. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1979-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321561484
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2110769
- The paper
- Rohde, D. W. (1979). Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.