The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions
Abstract
Kenneth A. Shepsle, Barry R. Weingast, Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Feb., 1984), pp. 49-74
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510809 · Cited by 4,810
Setting the agenda: responsible party government in the U.S. House of Representatives
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-4315 · Cited by 910
The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU
Pollack, M. A. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199251177.001.0001 · Cited by 888
Coalitions and Cabinet Government
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1990) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962770 · Cited by 447
Self-citationAn Assessment of the Positive Theory of 'Congressional Dominance'
Moe, T. M. (1987) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.2307/439745 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989122500
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2110787
- The paper
- Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1984). Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
