Cited by 378Q Methodology ApplicationsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model

Conover, Pamela Johnston, Feldman, Stanley·1984·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

A schematic model of political belief systems based on recent research in social and cognitive psychology is developed. We show that schema theory has the ability to bridge the gaps among the major competing approaches to the study of mass belief systems as well as provide direction for new research on the structure and functioning of political beliefs. An initial test of the theory, done with Q methodology, is reported and the results provide consistent support for the general predictions of schema theory as applied to political beliefs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2110789

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals' political opinion is often organized in a coherent structure of attitudes in which domain-specific opinions are grounded in broader political beliefs such as ideology.

    “In light of the schema theory, scholars of public opinion have posited that individuals' political opinion is often organized in a coherent structure of attitudes in which domain-specific opinions are grounded in a broader set of political beliefs (or”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
95
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035701098
Cited by
378
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Q Methodology Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
schema theory, political beliefs, political cognition, schematic model, Q methodology, political psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review