The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82
Abstract
The average vote margin enjoyed by incumbent candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives increased sharply during the 1 960s. Despite this, and contrary to assumptions common in the literature on recent congressional elections, electoral data show that House incumbents are no safer now than they were in the 1950s, the marginals, properly defined, have not vanished; the swing ratio has diminished little, if at all; and competition for House seats held by incumbents has not declined. Vote margins increased without adding to incumbent security, diminishing competition, or dampening swings because the heterogeneity of interelection vote swings increased at the same time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,130
Home Style: House Members in Their Districts, by Richard F. Fenno, Jr.
Leuthold, D. A. (1979) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2150167 · Cited by 1,601
Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals
Mayhew, D. R. (1974) · Polity · doi:10.2307/3233931 · Cited by 586
Money in congressional elections
(1983) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/0261-3794(83)90067-7 · Cited by 483
The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems
Tufte, E. R. (1973) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958782 · Cited by 471
The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections
Erikson, R. S. (1971) · Polity · doi:10.2307/3234117 · Cited by 453
Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections
Mann, T. E., & Wolfinger, R. E. (1980) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958145 · Cited by 326
The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It
Fiorina, M. P. (1977) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400259376 · Cited by 309
One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections
Cover, A. D. (1977) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110580 · Cited by 263
Johannes, J. R., & McAdams, J. C. (1981) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110817 · Cited by 233
Cited by
A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers
Diermeier, D., Keane, M., & Merlo, A. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828464 · Cited by 452
The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress
Carson, J. L., Koger, G., Lebo, M. J., & Young, E. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00449.x · Cited by 332
Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House
KOGER, G. (2003) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.3162/036298003x200872 · Cited by 295
The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures
Uppal, Y. (2009) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9336-4 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, G. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123699281
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 52.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2111327
- The paper
- Jacobson, G. C. (1987). The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
