Cited by 1,810Parental Involvement in EducationSocial and Cultural DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital

Lareau, Annette·1987·Sociology of Education

Abstract

This paper summarizes a qualitative study of family-school relationships in white working-class and middle-class communities. The results indicate that schools have standardized views of the proper role of parents in schooling. Moreover, social class provides parents with unequal resources to comply with teachers' requests for parental participation. Characteristics offamily life (e.g., social networks) also intervene and mediate family-school relationships. The social and cultural elements of family life that facilitate compliance with teachers' requests can be viewed as a form of cultural capital. The study suggests that the concept of cultural capital can be used fruitfully to understand social class differences in children's school experiences. The influence of family background on children's educational experiences has a curious place within the field of sociology of education. On the one hand, the issue has dominated the field. Wielding increasingly sophisticated methodological tools, social scientists have worked to document, elaborate, and replicate the influence of family background on educational

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2112583

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clash of norms, values, and agency between families and educational institutions can lead to members of those groups feeling threatened and alienated, unable to navigate institutions, and/or unable to support their children through them.

    “This clash of norms, values, and agency between those endorsed by families and those endorsed by educational institutions can lead to members of those groups feeling threatened and alienated within those institutions (Goudeau & Croizet, 2016), unable to successfully navigate their way through those educational institutions, and/or unable to support their children through them (Lareau, 1987(Lareau,”
  • The performance of upper- and middle-class students in education is better than working-class students.

    “Learning does not start from scratch and because of this, the performance of upper- and middle-class students in education is better than working-class students (Lareau, 1987; Calarco, 2018).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lareau, A.
Corresponding author
Lareau, Annette
Venue
Sociology of Education
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-04
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
73
ISSN
0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148588303
Cited by
1,810
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 79
FWCI
25.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
school-family relations, cultural capital, social class, parental involvement, working-class families, middle-class families, social networks, family background

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review