Cited by 5,046Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY*

AGNEW, ROBERT·1992·Criminology

Abstract

This paper presents a general strain theory of crime and delinquency that is capable of overcoming the criticisms of previous strain theories. In the first section, strain theory is distinguished from social control and differential association/social learning theory. In the second section, the three major types of strain are described: (1) strain as the actual or anticipated failure to achieve positively valued goals, (2) strain as the actual or anticipated removal of positively valued stimuli, and (3) strain as the actual or anticipated presentation of negatively valued stimuli. In the third section, guidelines for the measurement of strain are presented. And in the fourth section, the major adaptations to strain are described, and those factors influencing the choice of delinquent versus nondelinquent adaptations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economic strain is conceptualized as a gap between desired and actual economic outcomes.

    “A control variable is introduced for economic strain, conceptualized as a gap between desired and actual economic outcomes (Agnew 1992).”
  • Academic Pressure's negative association with Compliance Intention points beyond the fraud triangle toward Agnew's general strain theory, which holds that strain erodes the social bonds and commitments that sustain conformity.

    “Its negative association with Compliance Intention, however, points beyond the fraud triangle toward Agnew's (1992) general strain theory, which holds that strain not only creates a motive for rule-breaking but also erodes the social bonds and commitments that would otherwise sustain conformity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AGNEW, R.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
AGNEW, ROBERT
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-02
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
47-88
ISSN
  • 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9125
OpenAlex
W1977198508
Cited by
5,046
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 312 · 2025: 399 · 2024: 343 · 2023: 285 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 268 · 2020: 343 · 2019: 258 · 2018: 221 · 2017: 271 · 2016: 237 · 2015: 186 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 186 · 2012: 180
FWCI
41.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
strain theory, crime, delinquency, social control theory, differential association, social learning theory, goal failure, stimulus presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review