Cited by 1,720Social and Intergroup PsychologyEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityCultural Differences and Values

Attitudes vs. actions

LaPiere, R. T.·1934·Social Forces

Abstract

Journal Article Attitudes vs. Actions Get access Richard T. LaPiere Richard T. LaPiere Stanford University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 13, Issue 2, December 1934, Pages 230–237, https://doi.org/10.2307/2570339 Published: 01 December 1934

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2570339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaPiere, R. T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
LaPiere, R. T.
Venue
Social Forces
Published
1934-12-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
230-237
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2321515947
Cited by
1,720
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 53
FWCI
34.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Forces (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
attitudes, behavior, attitude-behavior relationship, social psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review