Information giving in medical care
Abstract
Information giving is a crucial element of medical care. This research project considered two theoretically grounded hypotheses: (1) Doctors may withhold information and maintain uncertainty to preserve power in the doctor-patient relationship, and (2) class-based sociolinguistic differences in language use may create further impediments to information giving. A multivariate research model was operationalized to study these hypotheses and to assess other associations between information giving and the characteristics of doctors, patients, and the clinical situations in which they interact. An analysis of a sample of 336 encounters recorded from several outpatient settings revealed that doctors spent little time informing their patients, overestimated the time they did spend, and underestimated patients' desire for information. Contingency-table analysis showed that information transmittal was associated with (1) doctors' income, social class background, political ideology, and perceptions of patients' informative needs; (2) patients' age, sex, social class, education, and prognosis; and (3) situational characteristics such as the length of acquaintance, numbers of patients seen per day, and the types of patients in the doctors' practices. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relative importance of these variables in explaining the variation in information transmittal. The findings did not clearly confirm a relationship among information withholding, uncertainty, and powe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Doctors may be less informative because they inaccurately assume that less educated and lower income patients are not particularly interested in learning about their health or don't understand this information.
“They are less informative with less educated and lower income patients, possibly because they inaccurately assume that these patients are not particularly interested in learning about their health or don't understand this information.(25,36)”
From Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? (2005) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Carson, K. A., Beach, M. C., Sabin, J. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Inui, T. S. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300558 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference?
Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., & De Maeseneer, J. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.011 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Time allocation in primary care office visits
Tai‐Seale, M., McGuire, T. G., & Zhang, W. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Notes on the Sociology of Medical Discourse: The Language of Case Presentation
Anspach, R. R. (1988) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136869 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
The social gradient in doctor-patient communication
Verlinde, E., De Laender, N., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., & Willems, S. (2012) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-12 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Smith, R. C., Lyles, J. S., Mettler, J., Stoffelmayr, B. E., Van Egeren, L. F., Marshall, A. A., Gardiner, J. C., Maduschke, K. M., Stanley, J. M., Osborn, G. G., et al. (1998) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00008 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Communicative styles and adaptations in physician–parent consultations
Street, R. L. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90289-3 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The technical and interpersonal aspects of telemedicine: effects on doctor–patient communication
Miller, E. A. (2003) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/135763303321159611 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Aelbrecht, K., Rimondini, M., Bensing, J., Moretti, F., Willems, S., Mazzi, M., Fletcher, I., & Deveugele, M. (2015) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9569-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waitzkin, H.
- Corresponding author
- Waitzkin, Howard
- ORCID
- Waitzkin, Howard
- Venue
- Journal of Health and Social Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81
- ISSN
- 0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075219085
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 38.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS-02100)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- information giving, physician-patient communication, withholding information, uncertainty, social class, physician remuneration, political ideology, outpatient visits, physician-patient interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Communication Barriers, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Social Class, Truth Disclosure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review