Cited by 466Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

Information giving in medical care

Waitzkin, Howard·1985·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

Information giving is a crucial element of medical care. This research project considered two theoretically grounded hypotheses: (1) Doctors may withhold information and maintain uncertainty to preserve power in the doctor-patient relationship, and (2) class-based sociolinguistic differences in language use may create further impediments to information giving. A multivariate research model was operationalized to study these hypotheses and to assess other associations between information giving and the characteristics of doctors, patients, and the clinical situations in which they interact. An analysis of a sample of 336 encounters recorded from several outpatient settings revealed that doctors spent little time informing their patients, overestimated the time they did spend, and underestimated patients' desire for information. Contingency-table analysis showed that information transmittal was associated with (1) doctors' income, social class background, political ideology, and perceptions of patients' informative needs; (2) patients' age, sex, social class, education, and prognosis; and (3) situational characteristics such as the length of acquaintance, numbers of patients seen per day, and the types of patients in the doctors' practices. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relative importance of these variables in explaining the variation in information transmittal. The findings did not clearly confirm a relationship among information withholding, uncertainty, and powe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2136599

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doctors may be less informative because they inaccurately assume that less educated and lower income patients are not particularly interested in learning about their health or don't understand this information.

    “They are less informative with less educated and lower income patients, possibly because they inaccurately assume that these patients are not particularly interested in learning about their health or don't understand this information.(25,36)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waitzkin, H.
Corresponding author
Waitzkin, Howard
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1985-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
81
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075219085
Cited by
466
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
38.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS-02100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
information giving, physician-patient communication, withholding information, uncertainty, social class, physician remuneration, political ideology, outpatient visits, physician-patient interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication Barriers, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Social Class, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review