Cited by 85Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Stability of Psychological Symptoms: Drug Use Consequences and Intervening Processes

Johnson, Robert J., Kaplan, Howard B.·1990·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

We integrate aspects of coping response, impaired ability, and motivational explanations for the causes and consequences of drug abuse, all which were cast previously as competing or alternative paradigms. We projected a model of 1) continual daily drug use as a consequence of early adolescent psychological symptoms and 2) continual daily drug use as an influential variable in maintaining or exacerbating these symptoms over the young adult life-course. Gender, race, and education also were modeled explicitly according to their presumed theoretical importance. Finally, we modeled contemporaneous factors such as physical health and employment status as the common consequences of the shared independent variables in order to reduce bias in the estimated structural relationships. We found that continual daily drug use is significantly dependent on early psychopathology and increases psychological symptoms significantly. Daily proximate drug use has direct negative effects on education. Education, in turn, improves both mental and physical symptoms significantly. During young adulthood, psychological symptoms are related significantly to contemporaneous unemployment and physical health limitations; thus modeling these symptoms as common consequences reduces potentially biased estimates of the effect of shared independent variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2136892

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, R. J., & Kaplan, H. B.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1990-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
277
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312814887
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA004310, DA02497, K05DA000136, DA04310, R01DA002497)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
drug use, adolescent psychopathology, psychological symptoms, early adulthood, coping, motivation, unemployment, physical health, gender differences, race, life course, structural equation modeling
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review