Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,028

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions

Bongaarts, John, Watkins, Susan Cotts·1996·Population and Development Review

Abstract

This analysis of fertility transition is conducted among 69 developing countries during 1960-90. It is argued that the relationship between socioeconomic development and the timing and pace of fertility decline is related to level of development regional progress in fertility decline and social interaction. The empirical test is based on the theoretical framework of Notestein and successors. Analysis is based on the UN human development index (HDI) during 1960-85 (life expectancy GDP and literacy). Findings indicate that there is a highly significant negative and nonlinear relationship between HDI and fertility. Fertility was highest among countries with low HDI scores. When HDI was over 0.7 all countries were in transition but there was no fixed threshold for entry into transition. Fertility varied widely among countries at any given level of development. Statistically significant findings and graphic presentation indicate that countries with levels of development over 0.3 in 1960-65 had higher fertility than countries with an HDI of 0.3 in 1985-90. The relationship between fertility and development shifted over time. Transition occurred first in the most industrialized literate and urban provinces of a macroregion and then other provinces in geographic proximity followed regardless of HDI level. Logistic models indicate that development level and years since the beginning of transition in the region were good predictors of transition status in Asia Latin America and Europe. The most rapid declines in fertility occurred in countries that had high levels of development at the onset of transition. How family planning affects the pace and timing of fertility decline cannot be determined. It is posited that the addition of social interaction (ideas evaluation of the merits of ideas social influence and local national and global channels of social interaction) measures to the empirical model would further explain the timing and pace of fertility transition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2137804

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,028

Metadata

Authors
Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C.
Venue
Population and Development Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
639
ISSN
0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965972316
Cited by
1,028
References
2
FWCI
65.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2137804
The paper
Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.