The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions
Abstract
This analysis of fertility transition is conducted among 69 developing countries during 1960-90. It is argued that the relationship between socioeconomic development and the timing and pace of fertility decline is related to level of development regional progress in fertility decline and social interaction. The empirical test is based on the theoretical framework of Notestein and successors. Analysis is based on the UN human development index (HDI) during 1960-85 (life expectancy GDP and literacy). Findings indicate that there is a highly significant negative and nonlinear relationship between HDI and fertility. Fertility was highest among countries with low HDI scores. When HDI was over 0.7 all countries were in transition but there was no fixed threshold for entry into transition. Fertility varied widely among countries at any given level of development. Statistically significant findings and graphic presentation indicate that countries with levels of development over 0.3 in 1960-65 had higher fertility than countries with an HDI of 0.3 in 1985-90. The relationship between fertility and development shifted over time. Transition occurred first in the most industrialized literate and urban provinces of a macroregion and then other provinces in geographic proximity followed regardless of HDI level. Logistic models indicate that development level and years since the beginning of transition in the region were good predictors of transition status in Asia Latin America and Europe. The most rapid declines in fertility occurred in countries that had high levels of development at the onset of transition. How family planning affects the pace and timing of fertility decline cannot be determined. It is posited that the addition of social interaction (ideas evaluation of the merits of ideas social influence and local national and global channels of social interaction) measures to the empirical model would further explain the timing and pace of fertility transition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Toward A Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory
Caldwell, J. C. (1976) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1971615 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
The Emergence of Lowest‐Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s
Kohler, H., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x · Cited by 1,451
Schmitt, D. P. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000051 · Cited by 974
Advances in development reverse fertility declines
Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H.-P., & Billari, F. C. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08230 · Cited by 782
Re‐theorizing Family Demographics
Esping‐Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x · Cited by 763
Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965972316
- Cited by
- 1,028
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2137804
- The paper
- Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.