Reproductive motivation and family-size preferences among Nigerian men
Abstract
Data collected from 3,073 couples in four Nigerian cities and one semi-urban settlement were used to examine reproductive decision-making and male motivation for large family size. The report concludes that the characteristic male-dominant and patrilineal traditions support large family size and that men's reproductive motivation, to a large extent, affects the reproductive behavior of their wives. Therefore, the factors influencing men's reproductive outcomes and intentions are considered important for fertility transition in Nigeria. Male education, age at marriage, monogamy, interspousal communication, and intention not to rely on children for old-age support are significantly related to smaller actual family size and preferences for smaller families, while being in a male-dominant family setting has a strong relation with large family size and preferences for larger families. The policy implication of this study is the need for programs targeted at men and designed to change their attitudes about population matters and motivate them, and hence their wives, to produce smaller families.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shared parental rights and responsibilities manifest in large extended kin households and in practices of 'kinship fostering', an informal system outside state involvement whereby children move to non-natal homes for shorter or longer periods and for reasons including collective cost sharing and reinforcing family ties.
“This manifests itself in large extended kin households and in practices of 'kinship fostering', an informal system outside state involvement whereby children move to non-natal homes for shorter or longer periods and for a myriad of reasons, including collective cost sharing and reinforcing family ties (Goody 1982;Isiugo-Abanihe 1994).”
From Navigating transnational childcare relationships: migrant parents and their children's caregivers in the origin country (2017) · cites this paper as Isiugo-Abanihe 1994
Cites
Family Structure, Implicit Contracts, and the Demand for Children in Southern Nigeria
Fapohunda, E. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1988) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1973625 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Attitudes of Urban Sudanese Men Toward Family Planning
Khalifa, M. (1988) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.2307/1966555 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Cultural forces tending to sustain high fertility.
Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, P. (1990) · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Male fertility attitudes: A neglected dimension in Nigerian fertility research
Adamchak, D. J., & Adebayo, A. (1987) · Biodemography and Social Biology · doi:10.1080/19485565.1987.9988660 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Do Marital Partners Have Different Reproductive Preferences in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Bankole, A., & Olaleye, D. O. (1995) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Child Fostering and High Fertility Interrelationships in West Africa
Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (1984) · Studies in third world societies · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The shadow of indebtedness: bridewealth and norms constraining female reproductive autonomy
Horne, C., Dodoo, F. N.-A., & Dodoo, N. D. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413484923 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
POEZE, M., DANKYI, E. K., & MAZZUCATO, V. (2017) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12135 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Ibadan (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Isiugo-Abanihe, Uche C.
- Venue
- Studies in Family Planning
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149
- ISSN
- 0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994918681
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Family Planning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- fertility preferences, fertility transition, male dominance, reproductive decision-making, men's education, age at marriage, monogamy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Choice Behavior, Communication, Cultural Characteristics, Decision Making, Family Characteristics, Family Planning Services, Fathers, Gender Identity, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nigeria, Reproduction, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review