Cited by 204Family Dynamics and RelationshipsDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesReproductive Health and Contraception

Reproductive motivation and family-size preferences among Nigerian men

Isiugo-Abanihe, Uche C.·1994·Studies in Family Planning

Abstract

Data collected from 3,073 couples in four Nigerian cities and one semi-urban settlement were used to examine reproductive decision-making and male motivation for large family size. The report concludes that the characteristic male-dominant and patrilineal traditions support large family size and that men's reproductive motivation, to a large extent, affects the reproductive behavior of their wives. Therefore, the factors influencing men's reproductive outcomes and intentions are considered important for fertility transition in Nigeria. Male education, age at marriage, monogamy, interspousal communication, and intention not to rely on children for old-age support are significantly related to smaller actual family size and preferences for smaller families, while being in a male-dominant family setting has a strong relation with large family size and preferences for larger families. The policy implication of this study is the need for programs targeted at men and designed to change their attitudes about population matters and motivate them, and hence their wives, to produce smaller families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2137941

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shared parental rights and responsibilities manifest in large extended kin households and in practices of 'kinship fostering', an informal system outside state involvement whereby children move to non-natal homes for shorter or longer periods and for reasons including collective cost sharing and reinforcing family ties.

    “This manifests itself in large extended kin households and in practices of 'kinship fostering', an informal system outside state involvement whereby children move to non-natal homes for shorter or longer periods and for a myriad of reasons, including collective cost sharing and reinforcing family ties (Goody 1982;Isiugo-Abanihe 1994).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C.
Affiliations
University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Isiugo-Abanihe, Uche C.
Venue
Studies in Family Planning
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-05
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
149
ISSN
0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994918681
Cited by
204
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in Family Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
fertility preferences, fertility transition, male dominance, reproductive decision-making, men's education, age at marriage, monogamy
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Communication, Cultural Characteristics, Decision Making, Family Characteristics, Family Planning Services, Fathers, Gender Identity, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nigeria, Reproduction, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review