The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Study of Administration
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · Cited by 1,990
Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”
Koppell, J. G. (2005) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x · Cited by 495
Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative
Kettl, D. F. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x · Cited by 376
Nabatchi, T. (2010) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074009356467 · Cited by 321
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005 · Cited by 288
Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00839.x · Cited by 142
Dimensions of Discretion: Specifying the Object of Street-Level Bureaucracy Research
Hupe, P. (2013) · dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management · doi:10.3224/dms.v6i2.10 · Cited by 127
Responsibility versus accountability in the Friedrich‐Finer debate
Jackson, M. (2009) · Journal of Management History · doi:10.1108/17511340910921790 · Cited by 98
Artificial intelligence and administrative evil
Young, M. M., Himmelreich, J., Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K.-C. (2021) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvab006 · Cited by 76
A Look at Efficiency in Public Administration: Past and Future
Manzoor, A. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014564936 · Cited by 67
Politicization of the Bureaucracy across and within Administrative Traditions
Cooper, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2020.1739074 · Cited by 51
Park, Y. J., & Matkin, D. S. T. (2021) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13269 · Cited by 34
Trust in political-administrative relations: The case of local authorities in norway and tanzania
Jacobsen, D. I. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00032-7 · Cited by 31
History of Educational Leadership/Management
Bates, R. (2010) · International Encyclopedia of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00412-7 · Cited by 32
Martínez Guzmán, J. P., Jordan, M. M., & Joyce, P. G. (2024) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12956 · Cited by 29
Vento, I. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13833 · Cited by 25
Theoretical Perspectives on Bureaucrats: A Quest for Democratic Agents
Železnik, A., & Fink-Hafner, D. (2023) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997231165998 · Cited by 21
Law and public administration: convergence and symbiosis
Harlow, C. (2005) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852305053886 · Cited by 18
Ringeisen, P., Bertolosi-Lehr, A., & Demaj, L. (2018) · Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences · doi:10.5334/ssas.123 · Cited by 4
Liu, R., & Han, Y. (2026) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70043 · Cited by 2
CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL CHALLENGES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE
Pestritto, R. J. (2021) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052521000200
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, W.
- Venue
- Political Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1887-06-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-222
- ISSN
- 0032-3195 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-165X
- OpenAlex
- W2127249496
- Cited by
- 2,376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.