The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dispositions and Conditionals
Abstract
Journal Article Dispositions and Conditionals Get access C.B. Martin C.B. Martin University of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 44, Issue 174, January 1994, Pages 1–8, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220143 Published: 01 January 1994
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Williamson, T. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470696675 · Cited by 2,277
From an Ontological Point of View
Heil, J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199259747.001.0001 · Cited by 888
From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis
Jackson, F. (2000) · doi:10.1093/0198250614.001.0001 · Cited by 560
Masked Abilities and Compatibilism
Fara, M. (2008) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzn078 · Cited by 375
An objective counterfactual theory of information
Cohen, J., & Meskin, A. (2006) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048400600895821 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C. B.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 174
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0031-8094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973443353
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispositions and Conditionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2220143
- The paper
- Martin, C. B. (1994). Dispositions and Conditionals. The Philosophical Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2220143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
