Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inequality Re-examined.

Archard, David, Sen, Amartya·1995·The Philosophical Quarterly

Abstract

Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Inequality Re-examined. By Amartya Sen. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. Pp. xiv + 207. Price £19.95.) David Archard David Archard University ofUbter at Jordanstown Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 45, Issue 181, October 1995, Pages 553–555, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220331 Published: 01 October 1995

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2220331

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,423

Metadata

Authors
Archard, D., & Sen, A.
Venue
The Philosophical Quarterly
Published
1995-10
Volume
45
Issue
181
Pages
553
ISSN
0031-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019368190
Cited by
1,423
References
0
FWCI
37.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality Re-examined. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2220331
The paper
Archard, D., & Sen, A. (1995). Inequality Re-examined. The Philosophical Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2220331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.