Measuring the Incidence of Insider Trading in a Market for State-Contingent Claims
Abstract
Hyun Song Shin; Measuring the Incidence of Insider Trading in a Market for State-Contingent Claims, The Economic Journal, Volume 103, Issue 420, 1 September 199
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Favourite‐Longshot Bias, Bookmaker Margins and Insider Trading in a Variety of Betting Markets
Cain, M., Law, D., & Peel, D. (2003) · Bulletin of Economic Research · doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00174 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Weak Form Efficiency in Sports Betting Markets
(2023) · American Journal of Management · doi:10.33423/ajm.v23i2.6051 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shin, H. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shin, Hyun Song
- ORCID
- Shin, Hyun Song
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 420
- Pages
- 1141
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974807807
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Securities Regulation and Market Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Stochastic processes and financial applications
- Keywords
- insider trading, state-contingent claims, market efficiency, information asymmetry, asset pricing, market microstructure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
