Weak Form Efficiency in Sports Betting Markets
Open accessAbstract
Betting on sports is increasingly popular, and legal in the United States. Many states have moved to legalize sports betting both in-person and on-line. In this paper we evaluate the sports betting market and assess its efficiency in the financial sense. Using a large dataset of betting odds and outcomes across a wide range of sports over an extended period, we evaluate the weak-form efficiency of the sports betting market. While we find some minor technical inefficiencies, overall, the markets are generally efficient, and no odds-based betting strategy will yield statistically significant long-term profits. But some bets are better than others. Slight underdog bets in professional and collegiate football and the UFC have had positive returns over an extended time frame, though they do not clear a statistical significance test. On the other hand, we find some bets clearly under perform. Longshot bets in college basketball are among the worst bets and longshot biases can be shown to exist in collegiate football and basketball as well as baseball.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 6 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Overall, the sports betting markets are generally efficient.
“overall, the markets are generally efficient”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
For CFB, an ANOVA test has a p-value of 0.089, giving weak evidence of a general difference across all bins.
“There is some weak evidence that there is a general difference across all bins, the ANOVA test has a p-value of 0.089.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A similar trough exists for both basketball leagues with even money odds being less popular than slight favorite matchups.
“A similar trough exists for both basketball leagues with even money odds being less popular than slight favorite matchups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
NFL returns show a longshot bias: returns on bets on lower-probability teams are lower than returns on bets on highly favored teams.
“The graph does seem to indicate a longshot bias, returns on bets on the lower probability teams have lower returns than bets on the highly favored teams.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The booksum and hold varies from game to game and league to league, but typically averages in the 3% range.
“The booksum and hold varies from game to game, and league to league, but typically averages in the 3% range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
For NFL bin 6, the null hypothesis of negative returns cannot be rejected; p-value .249.
“We cannot reject the null hypothesis for negative returns on bin 6, the p-value is .249.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For NFL, an ANOVA test of the null hypothesis that returns are the same for each bin has a p-value of .322, so the ability to reject equal returns is marginal at best.
“an ANOVA test of the null hypothesis that the returns are the same for each bin, has a p-value of .322,so our ability to reject the hypothesis of equal returns is marginal at best.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
College football odds are more lopsided than NFL odds.
“First the odds for college football are more lopsided than for the NFL”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
The NFL odds group with the strongest positive returns is bin 8, odds +125 to +144, corresponding to implied win probabilities of 41% to 44%.
“The odds group with the strongest positive returns corresponds to a bin 8 where odds range from +125 to +144, corresponding to implied win probabilities of 41% to 44%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Odds for professional and college basketball have a similar distribution to football.
“Odds for professional and college basketball have a similar distribution to football.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
Only 1.19% of NFL games are true even money bets with 50-50 odds.
“Only 1.19% of NFL games are true even money bets with 50-50 odds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
In CFB, there is a set of profitable bets in the slight underdog range of +285 to +150, representing implied win probabilities of about 26% to 40%.
“There is also a set of profitable bets in the slight underdog range, in the case of CFB those odds are in the range of +285 to +150.These represent implied win probabilities of about 26% to 40%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NFL odds are bimodal with a peak around 65% and a corresponding peak near 35%.
“The NFL odds are bimodal with a peak around 65%, and due to symmetry, a corresponding peak near 35%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
There is a small bump in the MLB distribution near the 50% level.
“There is in fact a small bump in the distribution near the 50% level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
The two NFL odds bins below bin 8 also offer a very small positive return.
“The two bins below that level also offer a very small positive return.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Slight favorite-underdog matchups are more common than even (pick'em) odds.
“Secondly, slight favorite-underdog matchups are more common than even (pick'em) odds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
Some sports betting markets are not weak-form efficient.
“we conclude that some of the markets are not weak-form efficient”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
No odds-based betting strategy will yield statistically significant long-term profits.
“no odds-based betting strategy will yield statistically significant long-term profits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingnone given
College basketball odds are more dispersed than professional basketball odds.
“College odds are more dispersed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingnone given
The slight favored effect is in place for both basketball leagues.
“and the slight favored effect is in place for both leagues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
Longshot bets in college basketball are among the worst bets.
“Longshot bets in college basketball are among the worst bets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
Near even money NFL games (probabilities in [.49,.51]) are only 1.28% of games.
“If we expand the range to near even money, probabilities in the range [.49,51] we still have only 1.28% of games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Findingown data
For NFL, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal cannot be rejected; p-value 0.65.
“If we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold we are unable to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of 0.65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For NBA, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal cannot be rejected; p-value .96.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold we are unable to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of .0.96.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For college basketball, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal can be rejected with a p-value of effectively 0.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, we are able to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of effectively 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For MLB, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal cannot be rejected; p-value 0.799.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, we are unable to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of 0.799.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For CFB, for the most extreme differences, bins 1 and 20, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected; p-value 0.70.
“For the most extreme differences, bins 1 and 20, we cannot reject the null hypothesis as the p-value is 0.70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For CFB, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal cannot be rejected; p-value 0.24.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold we are unable to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of 0.24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Where positive returns exist, the pre-tax returns are small.
“Where positive returns exist, the pre-tax returns are small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For MLB, the p-value on the ANOVA test that all returns are equal is 0.066.
“The p-value on the ANOVA test that all returns are equal is 0.066.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For NHL, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal cannot be rejected; p-value .938.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold we are unable to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a pvalue of .938.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For UFC, comparing actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, the null hypothesis that they are equal can be rejected with a p-value of 1.04e-05.
“When we compare the actual return on all bets to the bookmaker's average hold, we are able to reject the null hypothesis that they are equal with a p-value of 1.04e-05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Positive returns over the long run are punctuated with long periods of negative returns.
“And while they are positive over the long run, they are punctuated with long periods of negative returns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In college basketball, the returns between the biggest longshot bin and corresponding favorite are different with a p-value of less than 2.2E-16.
“The returns are different with a p-value of less than 2.2E-16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
At the most basic level, returns on bets placed on different ranges of odds yield different returns.
“At the most basic level the returns on bets placed on different ranges of odds yield different returns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The CFB odds that show positive returns are positive with questionable significance.
“The odds that do show positive returns are positive with questionable significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The data indicate a statistically significant longshot bias in college basketball that extends over much of the odds range.
“Our data indicates a statistically significant longshot bias in college basketball that extends over much of the odds range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For UFC, the difference between bins 4 and 16 is not quite statistically significant with a p-value of 0.063.
“The difference between bins 4 and 16 is not quite statistically significant with a p-vale of 0.063.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ANOVA tests for CBB and UFC indicate non-consistent returns across the full odds spectrum.
“ANOVA tests for CBB and UFC indicate non-consistent returns across the full odds spectrum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CBB and UFC, the hypothesis that the average return to the bettor across all bets is negative and equal to the expected hold can be rejected.
“In two sports, CBB and UFC, the hypothesis that the average return to the bettor across all bet is negative and equal to the expected hold can be rejected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For CFB, in the bin 2-19 longshot bias test, the null hypothesis can be rejected with a p-value of 0.0153.
“For the bin 2-19 test we can safely reject the null hypothesis with a p-value of 0.0153.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The strongest evidence to reject CFB efficiency is a longshot bias: bets on teams with odds in [+480, +1495] have statistically significantly lower returns than betting favorites in those contests at [-652, -3000].
“The strongest evidence to reject efficiency is the longshot bias of bets on teams with odds in the range of [+480, +1495] have statistically significantly lower returns than betting the favorites in those contests at [-652, -3000].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For CFB, the regression of actual win probability as a function of predicted win probability gives a slope with a 95% confidence interval of [.949, 1.01].
“The regression test of actual win probability as a function of predicted win probability gives a slope with a 95% confidence interval of [.949, 1.01].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For UFC, the p-value for a comparison between bins 1 and 20 is <2e-16.
“The p-value for a comparison between bins 1 and 20 is also <2e-16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over the long run, positive average returns have been detected in five of seven sports.
“So, over the long run positive average returns have been detected in five of seven sports.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For CFB, in the bin 3-18 longshot bias test, the null hypothesis can be rejected with a p-value of 0.0021.
“For the bin 3-18 test we can reject the null with a p-value of 0.0021.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For NBA, the p-value for the ANOVA test of equal returns is 0.839.
“The p-value for the ANOVA test of equal returns is 0.839.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The point of minimal risk occurs where the wagers are allocated in the same proportion as the true odds.
“The point of minimal risk occurs where the wagers are allocated in the same proportion as the true odds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The odds are defined so that having one team as a small favorite is more common than an even-money bet.
“It appears the odds are defined so that having one team as a small favorite is more common than an evenmoney bet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A bettor will have a positive expected profit if they wager on a set of bets where the true probability is greater than the implied betting probability.
“Conversely, a bettor will have a positive expected profit if they wager on a set of bets where the true probability is greater than the implied betting probability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Additional empirical support for Levitt's position that bookmakers exploit bettor biases to mis-state odds has been documented.
“Additional empirical support for this position has been documented (Paul andWeinbach 2012, Paul andWeinbach 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Paul andWeinbach 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Paul andWeinbach 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
There is a higher level of parity at the professional level (NFL) than in college football.
“implying a higher level of parity at the professional level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The risk-free zone occurs when the amount wagered on each outcome is between the implied and normalized probabilities.
“The risk-free zone occurs when the amount wagered on each outcome is between the implied and normalized probabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a risk-free region that occurs when wagers are allocated close to the same proportion as the implied odds.
“There is in fact a risk-free region that occurs when wagers are allocated close to the same proportion as the implied odds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The higher rate of return on slight underdog NFL bets is consistent with Levitt's hypothesis that bookmakers systematically shade the odds.
“This higher rate of return on slight underdog bets is again consistent with Levitt's hypothesis that bookmakers systematically shade the odds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levitt
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The bookmaker's expected profit will be positive when the implied probabilities are greater than the true probabilities.
“The bookmaker's expected profit will be positive when the implied probabilities (pHI, pTI) are greater than the true probabilities (pHT, pTT).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The bias away from even-money bets is consistent with Levitt's hypothesis that odds makers shade the odds, shifting even games to slight favorite/underdog games.
“This bias away from even-money bets is consistent with Levitt's hypothesis that odds makers shade the odds, shifting even games to slight favorite/underdog games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levitt 2004 source
- Interpretationown data
College basketball shows a very strong favorite-longshot bias.
“College basketball shows a very strong favorite-longshot bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
College basketball returns show the most significant longshot bias of all the sports examined in the paper.
“College basketball returns also show the most significant longshot bias of all the sports examined in this paper.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Betting on longshots in college basketball is a strategy very unlikely to be successful.
“Betting on longshots in college basketball, is for example a strategy very unlikely to be successful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Betting on the heavy underdog to pull off the big upset in college basketball is on average the worst bet among the major sports.
“Betting on the heavy underdog to pull of the big upset in college basketball is on average, the worst bet among the major sports.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Based on the inconsistency of returns on odds groups and longshot bias, the hypothesis that college basketball odds are strictly weak-form efficient can be rejected.
“So based on the inconsistency of returns on odds groups, and longshot bias we can reject the hypothesis that college basketball odds are strictly weak-form efficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Bets on slight underdogs in the NFL historically outperform bets in other odds ranges.
“Bets on slight underdogs in the NFL historically outperform bets in other odds ranges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There does not appear to be any clear longshot bias in the hockey odds.
“There does not appear to be any clear longshot bias in the hockey odds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The slope slightly above one further confirms the longshot bias in CBB odds.
“This slope slightly above one further confirms the long shot bias in CBB odds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
NBA odds cannot be concluded to be not weak form efficient.
“We therefore cannot conclude that NBA odds are not weak form efficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The hypothesis that MLB odds are strictly weak form efficient can be rejected based on a statistically significant longshot bias.
“So, again we can reject the hypothesis that MLB odds are strictly weak form efficient.In this case the rejection is based on a statistically significant longshot bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is some evidence to reject weak form efficiency of CFB odds.
“So, in summary we have some evidence to reject the weak form efficiency of CFB odds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The strategy analyzed in the paper-bet on all opportunities in a certain odds range-is not likely to be profitable after tax in the short to medium term.
“The strategy analyzed in this paper, bet on all opportunities in a certain odds range, is not recommended, nor is it likely to be profitable after tax in the short to medium term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The difference between actual CBB return and average hold is due in large part to the very low returns on heavy underdogs.
“The difference is due in large part to the very low returns on heavy underdogs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The study examined bets across a wide range of sports over an extended time period with a very large data set.
“We examined bets across a wide range of sports over an extended time period with a very large data set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
NHL odds appear to be the most efficient of the odds set examined.
“NHL odds appear to be the most efficient of the odds set we have examined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Bets on slight underdogs in football are more likely to be successful.
“Bets on slight underdogs in football, on the other hand, are more likely to be successful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 73
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe average return across all NFL bets is -4.20%, which is lower than the expected profit of -3.63% indicated by the average hold.
“the average return across all bets is -4.20% which is lower than the expected profit of -3.63% indicated by the average hold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NFL, a two-sample hypothesis test on returns in bin 1 and bin 20 (biggest underdogs and biggest favorites) has a p-value of .257, too high to confidently reject the null hypothesis.
“to perform a more formal test of the longshot bias we perform a two-sample hypothesis test on the returns in bin 1 and bin 20, the biggest underdogs and biggest favorites.While there appears to be a strong difference in the graph, the p-value of this test is .257;again, too high to confidently reject the null hypothesis with confidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLongshot biases exist in collegiate football, collegiate basketball, and baseball.
“longshot biases can be shown to exist in collegiate football and basketball as well as baseball”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NFL, a regression of predicted win probability in each bin against actual win probability failed to reject the null hypothesis that the slope is one; the 95% confidence interval is [.920, 1.03].
“This test failed to reject the null hypothesis that the slope of that line is one; the 95% confidence interval is [.920, 1.03].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe odds for UFC have a similar distribution to football and basketball, with a bi-modal distribution of slight favorites and underdogs.
“The odds for the UFC have a similar distribution to football and basketball, with a bi-modal distribution of slight favorites and underdogs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe density drops sharply with a trough at 50%.
“The density drops of sharply with a trough at 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSlight underdog bets in professional football, collegiate football, and the UFC have had positive returns over an extended time frame, though they do not clear a statistical significance test.
“Slight underdog bets in professional and collegiate football and the UFC have had positive returns over an extended time frame, though they do not clear a statistical significance test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven money bets are less common in college football at 0.71% of all games, and near even bets are 0.74%.
“Even money bets are even less common in college football at 0.71% of all games, near even bets are 0.74%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenOdds can be a little more extreme in hockey with the density extending to nearly 80%.
“Odds can be a little more extreme in hockey with the density extending to nearly 80%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NFL bin 8 (+125,+144), the test of the null hypothesis that returns are negative yields a p-value of 0.108, so the null cannot be rejected at the 5% cutoff.
“If we examine the return on the most profitable bin, bin 8 with odds of [+125,+144], and test the null hypothesis that these returns are negative, we obtain a p-value of 0.108 and we cannot reject that hypothesis using a standard cutoff of 5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOdds for MLB appear quite different: the even money trough is absent and even or near even odds are common.
“Odds for professional baseball (MLB) appear quite different.The even money trough is absent and even or near even odds are common.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtreme odds are much less common in MLB; odds greater than 75% appear quite rare.
“Extreme odds are also much less common.Whereas football and basketball both had extreme probabilities, at or near 100%, odds greater than 75% appear quite rare in MLB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrictly even odds are offered in 2.94% of MLB games and near even odds in 10.4% of games.
“Strictly even odds are offered in 2.94% of games and near even odds in 10.4% of games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPick'em odds are relatively rare in UFC, although there is a small minor bump at even odds.
“Pick'em odds are relatively rare, although there is a small minor bump at even odds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn NFL, bin 8 (+125 to +144) has the highest long-term return and the most consistently positive returns, 12 out of 16 seasons, with an overall return of 6.5%.
“Bin 8, odds in the range of [+125-+144] has the highest long-term return and the most consistently positive returns; 12 out of 16 seasons, and an overall return of 6.5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe modal odds for NFL underdogs is +170, corresponding to an implied probability of 37%.
“The modal odds for NFL underdogs is +170, corresponding to an implied probability of 37%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sports betting market has some technical inefficiencies, but the level of inefficiency is small.
“While we find some minor technical inefficiencies”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“However, the level of inefficiency is small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStrictly even odds are offered in 2.29% of NHL games and near even odds in 4.59% of games.
“Strictly even odds are offered in 2.29% of games and near even odds in 4.59% of games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf all UFC odds quoted, 2.08% are at even money and 2.70% are at near even money.
“Of all the odds quoted, 2.08% are at even money and 2.70% are at near even money.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CFB graph is similar to the NFL graph: returns are uneven, and heavy longshots yield very low returns relative to other groups.
“The CFB graph is similar to the NFL graph; returns are uneven, heavy longshots yield very low returns relative to other groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCFB returns in the profitable bins are sometimes positive and sometimes negative over a season, with less consistency than NFL.
“As was the case with professional football, the returns in these bins are sometimes positive and sometimes negative over the course of a season, though there is less consistency than there was for the NFL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe technical inefficiencies vary from sport to sport but are reasonably consistent over time.
“These inefficiencies vary from sport to sport but are reasonably consistent over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe returns in the three NFL bins representing 30% of games in each season vary considerably, with each bin positive in some seasons and negative in others.
“The returns in these 3 bins, representing 30% of the games in each season, vary considerably.Each bin has positive returns in some seasons, and negative returns in others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NFL, p-values on other nominally positive returns are above the cutoff: bin 7 p=0.427 and bin 18 p=0.366.
“The p value on bin 7 is 0.427, and the p value on bin 18 is 0.366.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn college basketball, even money is 1.07% and near even money is 1.11%.
“In college basketball the figures are 1.07%for even money and 1.11% for near even money.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe odds for NHL are similar to baseball, but with a pronounced peak near parity.
“The odds for professional hockey are similar to baseball, but with a pronounced peak near parity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven odds are quoted in 0.99% of NBA games, while near even odds are stated in 1.15% of games.
“Even odds are quoted in 0.99% of NBA games, while near even odds are stated in 1.15% of games.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NHL, the p-value for an ANOVA test of the hypothesis that all returns are equal is 0.905, so the null hypothesis cannot be rejected.
“The p-value for an ANOVA test of the hypothesis that all returns are equal is 0.905, so we cannot reject the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NHL, returns in all bins are negative, with the profit in bin 5 [+130, +139] being effectively zero at -0.003%; the p-value for the hypothesis test that returns are negative is 0.364, so the null cannot be rejected.
“The returns in all bins is negative with the profit in bin 5 [+130, +139] being effectively zero at -0.003%.The p-value with associated with the hypothesis test that the returns are negative is 0.364, so we cannot reject the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe actual average return on college basketball bets is -7.71% versus the average hold of -3.56%.
“The actual average return on college basketball bets is -7.71% vs. the average hold of -3.56%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor UFC, statistically significant differences exist between bins 2 and 19 (<2e-16) and 3 and 18 (3.86e-07).
“Statistically significant differences exist between bins 2 and 19 (<2e-16), 3 and 18 (3.86e-07).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn college basketball, the longshot bias holds for bins 2-19 (p=2.51E-09), 3-18 (p=1.324E-07), 4-17 (p=2.74E-07), 5-16 (p=1.70E-06), 6-15 (p=0.0174), 7-14 (p=0.0045), and 8-13 (p=0.0086).
“The longshot bias also holds for bins 2-19 (p-value 2.51 E-09), bins 3-18 (p-value 1.324E-07), bins 4-17 (p-value 2.74E-07), bins 5-16 (p-value 1.70E-06), bins 6 and 15 (p-value 0.0174), bins 7 and 14 (p-value 0.0045), and bins 8 and 13 (p-value 0.0086).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCollege basketball returns show significant variation; a formal ANOVA test confirms this with a p-value of less than 2E-16.
“The returns on best in college basketball show significant variation.A formal ANOVA test confirms this with a p-value of less than 2E-16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProfessional hockey returns are similar to baseball in that they are all mostly negative and reasonably consistent.
“They are similar to baseball in that they are all mostly negative and reasonably consistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe NBA slope is slightly greater than 1, while the CFB slope is slightly below 1.
“The NBA slope is slightly greater than 1, while the CFB slope is slightly below 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPro basketball returns are generally negative, with a very small positive return in bin 2, but the p-value of 0.417 provides very low confidence that this is a meaningfully positive return.
“Pro basketball returns are generally negative, with a very small positive return in bin 2, but the p-value of 0.417 provides very low confidence that this is a meaningfully positive return.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor CFB, returns on bins 6-8 have been positive over an extended period, but there is limited evidence that this is a statistically significant difference; p-values are 0.289, 0.428, and 0.108 respectively.
“While the returns on bins 6-8 have been positive over an extended period of time, we have limited evidence that this is a statistically significant difference.If we test the null hypothesis that the returns are negative the p-values on these tests are 0.289, 0.428, and 0.108 respectfully.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBets on extreme long shots in college basketball yield very poor returns, while bets on corresponding heavy favorites also yield negative returns but these returns are significantly better.
“Bets on extreme long shots in college basketball yield very poor returns while bets on corresponding heavy favorites in college basketball also yield negative returns, but these returns are significantly better.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor UFC, the slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.983, 1.08], so no bias exists across the distribution.
“slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.983, 1.08] so no bias exists across the distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe average return on UFC bets is -5.82%, less than the average hold of -4.40%.
“The average return on UFC bets is -5.82%, less than the average hold of -4.40%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor MLB, a longshot bias is clear: bets on the biggest underdogs yield a return of -7.32%, while the corresponding favorites yield a -0.72% return; the returns are different with a p-value of 0.017.
“A longshot bias is clear with bets on the biggest underdogs yielding a return of -7.32, with the corresponding favorites yielding a -0.72% return.The returns are different with a p-value of 0.017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NHL, the slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.934, 1.01], so no bias exists across the distribution.
“The slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.934, 1.01] so no bias exists across the distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor UFC, very small positive profits in bins 19 and 20 (.795 and .862) have p-values of 0.30 and 0.31.
“The very small positive profits in bins 19 and 20 (.795 and .862)have p-values of 0.30 and 0.31.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NBA, the largest difference in complementary bin profits is between bins 2 and 19, a potential reverse longshot bias, but the p-value is .238.
“The largest difference in complementary bin profits is between bins 2 and 19, a potential reverse longshot bias, but the p-value here is .238.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBets on extreme underdogs in college basketball have very poor returns, and in general bets on underdogs perform significantly worse than bets on favorites.
“Bets on extreme underdogs have very poor returns, and in general bets on underdogs perform significantly worse than bets on favorites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NBA, the null hypothesis that the odds are unbiased can be rejected: the slope of the regression line of actual win percentage to predicted win probability is [.938, .978], which does not include 1.
“We can also reject the null hypothesis that the odds are unbiased.The slope of the regression line of actual win percentage to predicted win probability is [.938, .978]which does not include 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn college basketball, returns are negative on all bins, the biggest longshot bin has a negative return of nearly 50%, and betting on the corresponding favorite has a return of -0.2%.
“While returns are negative on all bins, the biggest longshot bin has a negative return of nearly 50%.Betting on the corresponding favorite has a return of -0.2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor college basketball, the null hypothesis that the slope of the projected to actual win regression line is 1 can be rejected; the 95% confidence interval is [1.02, 1.03].
“For college basketball we can also reject the null hypothesis that the slope of the projected to actual win regression line has a slope of 1.The 95% confidence interval is [1.02, 1.03].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor MLB, the slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.963, 1.05], so no bias exists across the distribution.
“The slope of the predicted to actual win percentage line is in the interval [.963, 1.05] so no bias exists across the distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUFC returns show a significant difference across the odds distribution; the ANOVA test has an effectively 0 p-value (<2e-16).
“The UFC returns do show a significant difference across the odds distribution, the ANOVA test has an effectively 0 p-value (<2e-16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMLB returns generally have a negative return over time, though there is a small positive return on bets in bin 14 corresponding to odds of [-125, -132], a slight favorite; the return is 1.48%, but the p-value associated with the test that it is less than zero is 0.891.
“Returns generally have a negative return over time, though there is a small positive return on bet in bin 14 corresponding to odds of [-125, -132] a slight favorite.The return is 1.48%, but the p-value associated with the test that it less than zero is 0.891.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NHL, the return on the biggest longshots, bin 1 [+190, +505], is -4.13%, slightly worse than the returns on complementary odds in bin 20 [-700, -219], which are -2.91%; the null hypothesis that these returns are different cannot be rejected with a p-value of .546.
“The return on the biggest longshots, bin 1 [+190, +505] are -4.13%,slightly worse than the returns on the complementary odds in bin 20 [-700, -219] which are -2.91%.We fail to reject the null hypothesis that these returns are different with a p-value of .546.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor NHL, bins 2 and 19 show a nominal reverse longshot bias: bin 2 returns are -2.19% and bin 19 returns are -3.28%, but the null hypothesis that these returns are different has a p-value of 0.725%.
“The returns on the set of bins 2 and 19, show a nominal reverse longshot bias.Bin 2 returns are -2.19% and bin 19 returns are -3.28%,but the null hypotheses that these returns are different is 0.725%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA statistically significant longshot bias exists in both college sports, MLB, and the UFC.
“A statistically significant longshot bias exists in both college sports, MLB, and the UFC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor UFC, long run profit is positive in bins 6 and 7 (2.44 and 2.49), but the p-values do not quite make the 5% threshold at 6.28% and 6.50%.
“The long run profit is positive in bins 6 and 7 (2.44 and 2.49), but the p-values do not quite make the 5% threshold at 6.28% and 6.50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA statistically significant odds bias can be detected for professional and collegiate basketball; when actual win probability is regressed on predicted win probability, the 95% confidence interval for these sports does not contain 1.
“Finally, we can detect a statistically significant odds bias for professional and collegiate basketball; when we regress actual win probability to predicted win probability the 95% confidence interval for these sports does not contain 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSlight underdog bets appear to be the best option for NFL games and have earned a small positive return over the 16 seasons in the data set, but those returns are highly variable and the null hypothesis that they are negative cannot be rejected.
“Slight underdog bets appear to be the best option for NFL games and they have earned a small positive return over the 16 seasons in our data set, those returns are highly variable and we cannot reject the null hypothesis that they are negative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere is evidence suggesting NFL odds are weak form inefficient, but conclusions are tentative due to variable returns, and no hypothesis that would invalidate weak form efficiency can be rejected.
“In summary there is evidence that would suggest that the odds for NFL games are weak form inefficient.While there appears to be a variation in return against different odds groups and heavy longshot bets have historically performed the worst, but these conclusions are tentative due to the variable state of the returns.”
- Also stated in: § FIGURE 9 NFL RETURNS · hedged
“While we can observe some anomalies from the strict requirements of weak-form efficiency, we cannot reject any hypothesis that would invalidate weak form efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § FIGURE 9 NFL RETURNS · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe general consensus has been that odds makers set odds so as to attract the appropriate level of bets on either side.
“The general consensus has been that odds makers set odds so as to attract the appropriate level of bets on either side.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pankoff 1968 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile statistically significant, the odds-bias discrepancies are quite small.
“While statistically significant, these discrepancies are quite small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMinor inefficiencies exist in some betting markets and making money betting on sports is difficult.
“While our analysis shows that minor inefficiencies exist in some betting markets and confirms that making money betting on sports is difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile there are some nominal differences in historical NHL returns, all bins are negative and none of the differences can be shown to be the result of anything but statistical noise.
“While there are some nominal differences in the historical returns, all bins are negative and none of the differences can be shown to be the result of anything but statistical noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe average returns are less than the average hold, so the bettor does worse and the abnormal return accrues to the sportsbook.
“However, it is extremely important to note that the average returns are less than the average hold so the bettor does worse and the abnormal return accrues to the sportsbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile CBB odds fail the strict weak form efficiency test, there are no profitable odds ranges available to the bettor.
“While CBB odds fail the strict weak form efficiency test, there are no profitable odds ranges available to the bettor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study only looked at moneyline bets and did not examine spreads, totals, or proposition bets.
“First, we only looked at moneyline bets.We did not examine the other major markets of spreads and totals, not the more exotic markets of proposition bets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study only analyzed a strategy of placing bets based on the odds, and therefore tested for weak form efficiency.
“A further limitation of this paper is that we only analyzed a strategy of placing bets based on the odds, and therefore tested for weak form efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBets on slight underdogs in UFC are positive but only at the roughly 6% level.
“Bets on slight underdogs are positive but only at the roughly 6% level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe positive average returns detected over the long run are not consistently positive and none can be confirmed as statistically significant.
“While these returns are positive over an extended period of time, they are not consistently positive and none of them can be confirmed as statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMany of the differences in returns across odds ranges are statistically indistinguishable from random variation, while others are meaningful.
“But many of these differences are statistically indistinguishable from random variation, while others are meaningful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUFC returns are similar in some ways to football, with a slight underdog profit, but also similar to basketball with what would appear to be a significant long shot bias.
“These returns are similar in some ways to football, with a slight underdog profit.But they are also similar to basketball with what would appear to be a significant long shot bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUFC odds are not strictly weak form efficient because results are not consistent across the odds distribution and a statistically significant longshot bias exists.
“We can conclude that the UFC odds are not strictly weak form efficient as the results are not consistent across the odds distribution and a statistically significant longshot bias exists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor NBA, a slope less than 1 indicates that actual win probability increases slightly less than the win probability projected by the odds, though the difference is very minor.
“A slope less than indicates that the actual win probability increases slightly less than the win probability projected by the odds, those this difference is very minor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSome bets are better, or worse, than others.
“But what our analysis does show is that some bets are better, or worse, then others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile one band of MLB favorite odds has a nominally positive return, these returns cannot be concluded to be non-negative at a reasonable level of statistical significance.
“While one band of favorite odds has a nominally positive return, we cannot conclude that these returns are non-negative at a reasonable level of statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationBookmakers systematically shade the odds on true pick-'em games to slightly favor one team and attract a disproportionate share of bets on the favorite.
“Levitt's hypothesis that bookmakers systematically shade the odds.If bookmakers shift the odds on true pick-'em games to slightly favor one team and attract a disproportionate share of bets on the favorite, it would stand to reason that betting the underdog team would be a higher expected value bet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Levitt
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBetting underdogs in general, and longshots in basketball, is in general a losing proposition.
“Betting underdogs in general, and longshots in basketball is in general a losing proposition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The odds and results data collected from Sports Book Review and BestFightOdds are accurate and representative of the sports betting market.
“Data for the team sports has been collected from the website Sports Book Review (TopSportsbooks 2022).”
“UFC Odds are collected from the web site BestFightOdds.com.”
“the data is not without issue.Considerable effort was required to merge and clean the data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The true probabilities for sporting events are unknown and unknowable.
“While the probabilities for a coin flip, or a number draw, are known, the true probabilities for a sporting event are unknown, and unknowable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A sports event is a one-time event, so its probabilities are belief probabilities with no long-term frequency analogy.
“Since the sports event is in fact a one-time event, the probabilities are belief probabilities with no long-term frequency analogy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Draws are rare in the sports evaluated, and if a contest ends in a draw all win-lose bets are cancelled and stakes returned.
“Draws are rare in the sports we are evaluating.So, if the contest ends in a draw all win-lose bets are effectively cancelled, and bettors are returned their original stake.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bookmakers seek to maximize expected profit over similar bets and minimize risk on individual contests.
“Over the long term, the bookmaker seeks to maximize their expected profit on similar bets, as well as minimizing the potential risk on any individual contest.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion reverses the NBA odds-bias result
MajorThe conclusion says the NBA slope exceeds one, whereas the NBA section gives a confidence interval entirely below one. This reverses the direction of a statistically significant result.
“The NBA slope is slightly greater than 1, while the CFB slope is slightly below 1.”
“The slope of the regression line of actual win percentage to predicted win probability is [.938, .978]which does not include 1.”
Risk equation omits the offsetting wager
MinorThe prose defines a loss on heads by subtracting the wager on tails, but equation (7) takes the maximum payout without subtracting that wager.
“𝑟 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [ 𝐵 𝐻 𝑀 𝐻 100 + 𝐵 𝐻 , 𝐵 𝑇 𝑀 𝑇 100 + 𝐵 𝑇 ](7)”
“Assume that for a particular trial the outcome is heads, the loss on this trial is equal to the payout on heads less the amount wagered on tails.”
Conclusion assigns significant odds bias to CFB
MinorThe conclusion describes the CFB slope as a statistically significant discrepancy, but the CFB section gives a 95% confidence interval containing one. The significant above-one interval is reported for CBB, not CFB.
“Finally, we can detect a statistically significant odds bias for professional and collegiate basketball; when we regress actual win probability to predicted win probability the 95% confidence interval for these sports does not contain 1.The NBA slope is slightly greater than 1, while the CFB slope is slightly below 1.”
“The regression test of actual win probability as a function of predicted win probability gives a slope with a 95% confidence interval of [.949, 1.01].”
Dataset start date is later than its earliest listed contest
MinorThe total row starts the dataset on June 19, 2007, although the UFC row lists contests beginning on June 16, 2007.
“UFC 2007-06-16 2022-12-17 6,190 2007 2022 16 2,021”
“Total 2007-06-19 2023-01-09 155,563 2,803”
Coin-toss booksum is called the profit margin
MinorFor two sides at -120, the 9.1% excess implied probability is the booksum. Equation (5) makes the bookmaker's margin about 8.3%, matching the expected profit stated immediately afterward.
“These odds give an implied probability of 54.5% for each outcome and a book margin of approximately 9.1%.From equation ( 6) the bookmaker's expected profit is 8.3% of the total money wagered.”
“The bookmaker's margin (m), also known as the hold, is the sportsbook's average profit and can be shown to be 𝑚 = 𝑘 𝑘+1 (5)”
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524 · see citing works
EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK*
Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x · Cited by 15,733 · see citing works
Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work
Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325486 · Cited by 13,635 · see citing works
Anomalies: Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries
Thaler, R. H., & Ziemba, W. T. (1988) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.2.2.161 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Why are Gambling Markets Organised so Differently from Financial Markets?
Levitt, S. D. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00207.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Explaining the Favorite–Long Shot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions?
Snowberg, E., & Wolfers, J. J. (2010) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/655844 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Measuring the Incidence of Insider Trading in a Market for State-Contingent Claims
Shin, H. S. (1993) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234240 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Prices of State Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favourite-Longshot Bias
Shin, H. S. (1992) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234526 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Testing Rationality in the Point Spread Betting Market
GANDAR, J., ZUBER, R., O'BRIEN, T., & RUSSO, B. (1988) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02617.x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Information and efficiency: an empirical study of a fixed odds betting market
Kuypers, T. (2000) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036840050151449 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Optimal Betting Odds Against Insider Traders
Shin, H. S. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234434 · Cited by 166 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach, sometimes known as the Shin model, was developed by Hyun Song Shin in the early 1990s (Shin 1991, Shin 1992, Shin 1993).”
The Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in UK Football Betting
Cain, M., Law, D., & Peel, D. (2000) · Scottish Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00151 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The Favorite-Longshot Bias: An Overview of the Main Explanations
Ottaviani, M., & Sørensen, P. N. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044450744-0.50009-3 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Market Efficiency and Football Betting
Pankoff, L. D. (1968) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/295077 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
The Favourite‐Longshot Bias, Bookmaker Margins and Insider Trading in a Variety of Betting Markets
Cain, M., Law, D., & Peel, D. (2003) · Bulletin of Economic Research · doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00174 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
DOES SPORTSBOOK.COM SET POINTSPREADS TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS?
Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2012) · The Journal of Prediction Markets · doi:10.5750/jpm.v1i3.429 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Gandar, J. M., Zuber, R. A., Johnson, R. S., & Dare, W. H. (2002) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036840110095427 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
EFFICIENCY IN BETTING MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM ENGLISH FOOTBALL
Deschamps, B., & Gergaud, O. (2012) · The Journal of Prediction Markets · doi:10.5750/jpm.v1i1.420 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Testing Rationality in the Point Spread Betting Market
Gandar, J. M., Zuber, R. A., O'Brien, T., et al. (1988) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2328148 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions?
Snowberg, E., & Wolfers, J. (2010) · doi:10.3386/w15923 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
A Reexamination of the Efficiency of the Betting Market on National Hockey League Games
Gandar, J. M., Zuber, R. A., & Johnson, R. S. (2004) · Journal of Sports Economics · doi:10.1177/1527002503257208 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Are betting markets efficient? Evidence from European Football Championships
Direr, A. (2013) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.602010 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
How Do Markets Function? An Empirical Analysis of Gambling on the National Football League
Levitt, S. D. (2003) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w9422 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Are Sports Bettors Biased toward Longshots, Favorites, or Both? A Literature Review
Newall, P. W. S., & Cortis, D. (2021) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks9010022 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Smithers, A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192847096.003.0031 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Efficiency in the madness? examining the betting market for the ncaa men’s basketball tournament
Hickman, D. C. (2020) · Journal of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1007/s12197-020-09507-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Paul, R. J., & Weinbach, A. P. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hickman, D., & Metz, N. (2024) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2024.2364077 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Conversational Forecasting Across Large Human Groups Using a Swarm of Surrogate AI Agents
Rosenberg, L. B., Schumann, H., Mani, G., & Willcox, G. (2026) · International Conference on Human-AI Interaction and Experience Design (HAXD) · doi:10.1109/haxd70072.2026.11620928
Efficient market insights and favorite-longshot bias in mixed martial arts betting markets
Miller, K. M., & Nichols, M. W. (2026) · Journal of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1007/s12197-026-09757-x
- Authors
- Robbins, T. R.
- Affiliations
- East Carolina University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas R. Robbins
- ORCID
- Thomas R. Robbins
- Venue
- American Journal of Management
- Publisher
- North American Business Press
- Published
- 2023-05-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2165-7998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4378803412
- Semantic Scholar
- 8e63ac548cc1fad5fa8c4a635776d923e5fb8f36
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- sports betting, weak-form market efficiency, betting odds, professional football, college football, college basketball, UFC, baseball, betting strategies, market efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review