Cited by 75Sports Analytics and PerformanceFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The Favourite‐Longshot Bias, Bookmaker Margins and Insider Trading in a Variety of Betting Markets

Open access
Cain, Michael, Law, David, Peel, David·2003·Bulletin of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper verifies the existence of the favourite‐longshot bias in a variety of sports betting markets where odds are set by bookmakers, but the precise pattern of the bias is not identical. Evidence is found to support a central prediction of the Shin (1993) model, which asserts that bookmakers are impelled to create a bias in their odds because of the presence of insider traders: that margins increase with the number of competitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8586.00174

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Blough, S. R. (1994). 'Differences of opinion at the racetrack', pp. 323-42 in
  2. Hausch, D. B., Lo, V. S. Y. and Ziemba, W. T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, San Diego: Academic Press.
  3. Busche, K. (1994). 'Efficient market results in an Asian setting', pp. 615-16 in
  4. Hausch, D. B., Lo, S. Y. and Ziemba, W. T. (eds.), Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, San Diego: Academic Press.
  5. Hausch, D. B., Lo, V. S. Y. and Ziemba, W. T. (eds.) (1994). Efficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets, San Diego: Academic Press.
  6. Sauer, R. D. (1998). 'The economics of wagering markets', Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 2021-64.
  7. BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH # Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Board of Trustees of the Bulletin of Economic Research 2003. 14678586, 2003, 3, · DOI
  8. THE FAVOURITE-LONGSHOT BIAS 273 # Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Board of Trustees of the Bulletin of Economic Research 2003. 14678586, 2003, 3, · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cain, M., Law, D., & Peel, D.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
Venue
Bulletin of Economic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-27
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
263-273
ISSN
  • 0307-3378 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8586
OpenAlex
W1999172355
Cited by
75
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bulletin of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
favorite-longshot bias, insider trading, sports betting, betting odds, market competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review