Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Edaphic and Human Effects on Landscape‐Scale Distributions of Tropical Rain Forest Palms

Clark, Deborah A., Clark, David B., Sandoval, Rosa M., Castro, Marco Vinicio C.·1995·Ecology

Abstract

We studied the landscape—level spatial variation in distribution and abundance of seven species of canopy and subcanopy palms in a neotropical rain forest. Within 568 ha of nonswamp old—growth lowland forest at the La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica, we sampled at 516 intersections of a reserve—wide grid to systematically assess the species' distributions across the major edaphic gradients. We found mosaics of community structure related to marked within—forest variability in both soil and topography. Total stem density of this guild varied with both edaphic factors. Steep sites had twice as many large palms (>10 m tall) per hectare than those on gentler topography or at lower slope positions. The combined density of subcanopy and canopy palms also varied significantly among soil types in the smallest size class (1—5 m tall), but not for larger individuals. Local (point) species richness of the subcanopy and canopy palms varied among soil types. Of the seven species, two (Astrocaryum alatum and A. confertum) were rare. All others showed significant edaphic variation in their distribution and/or estimated density. Two closely related species had strong and opposite edaphic associations. Euterpe macrospadix was biased toward steep topography and less fertile sites. Prestoea decurrens was nearly ommipresent on soil types with gentle topography while absent from half the points on soils with steep slopes. Two other closely related species, Iriartea deltoidea and Socratea exorrhiza, while virtually omnipresent across soil types and topographic positions, showed marked reciprocal variation in density between related soils. Iriartea's spatial distribution further indicates local removal of this species from one sector of the old growth by human harvesting (with subsequent apparent r elease of Socratea in this site). The most abundant species, Welfia georgii, while present at all sample points, showed significant among—soil variation in density. This substructuring of the arborescent palm guild results from the interplay of edaphic variation and past human activity. These findings and evidence from other sites suggest that marked spatial heterogeneity in community structure, at small to large scales (0.5—10 3 ha), may be general among tropical wet forests. Study of the spatial scales and causes of this variability will produce a more robust understanding of these complex ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2265829

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Clark, D. A., Clark, D. B., Sandoval, R. M., & Castro, M. V. C.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
76
Issue
8
Pages
2581-2594
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1990512601
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edaphic and Human Effects on Landscape‐Scale Distributions of Tropical Rain Forest Palms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2265829
The paper
Clark, D. A., Clark, D. B., Sandoval, R. M., & Castro, M. V. C. (1995). Edaphic and Human Effects on Landscape‐Scale Distributions of Tropical Rain Forest Palms. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265829

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.