The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Abstract
For various reasons individuals in a sample survey may prefer not to confide to the interviewer the correct answers to certain questions. In such cases the individuals may elect not to reply at all or to reply with incorrect answers. The resulting evasive answer bias is ordinarily difficult to assess. In this paper it is argued that such bias is potentially removable through allowing the interviewee to maintain privacy through the device of randomizing his response. A randomized response method for estimating a population proportion is presented as an example. Unbiased maximum likelihood estimates are obtained and their mean square errors are compared with the mean square errors of conventional estimates under various assumptions about the underlying population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing defenses against the targeted backdoor attacks can be categorized into two types: detection methods and erasing methods [150].”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Citations
Cites
Sampling Techniques, Second Edition
G., C. W. (1963)
UnresolvedSome Theory of Sampling
E., D. W. (1950)
UnresolvedSample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I
H., H. M. (1953)
UnresolvedSample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume II
H., H. M. (1953)
UnresolvedSampling Opinions
F., S. F. (1963)
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 584
Ju, Z., & Li, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2023.3304413 · Cited by 28
Personalized Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation for Histogram Estimation
Wang, S., Huang, L., Tian, M., Yang, W., Xu, H., & Guo, H. (2015) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417364 · Cited by 27
Optional versus compulsory randomized response techniques in complex surveys
Chaudhuri, A., & Saha, A. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.023 · Cited by 28
Successive Point-of-Interest Recommendation With Local Differential Privacy
Kim, J. S., Kim, J. W., & Chung, Y. D. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076809 · Cited by 27
Bayesian approximations in randomized response model
Migon, H. S., & Tachibana, V. M. (1997) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(96)00075-8 · Cited by 27
Some New Results on the Multinomial Randomized Response Model
Kim, J., & Warde, W. D. (2005) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1081/sta-200054378 · Cited by 27
Sociology and compelled disclosure: Protecting respondent confidentiality
Picou, J. S. (1996) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.1996.9982131 · Cited by 26
Nayak, T. K., & Adeshiyan, S. A. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.013 · Cited by 26
Locally Differentially Private Sparse Vector Aggregation
Zhou, M., Wang, T., Chan, T.-H. H., Fanti, G. C., & Shi, E. (2022) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833635 · Cited by 31
Violation of respondent's privacy in moors* model- its rectification through a random group strategy
Mangat, N. S., Singh, R., & Singh, S. (1997) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929708831946 · Cited by 26
Tang, M., Tian, G. L., Tang, N., et al. (2009) · Journal of the Korean Statistical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jkss.2008.12.004 · Cited by 25
Silva, M. T., Galvão, T. F., Silva, M. T., et al. (2017) · Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde · doi:10.5123/s1679-49742017000400005 · Cited by 25
Network Traffic Shaping for Enhancing Privacy in IoT Systems
Xiong, S., Sarwate, A. D., & Mandayam, N. B. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2021.3140174 · Cited by 25
Heavy Hitter Identification Over Large-Domain Set-Valued Data With Local Differential Privacy
Zhu, Y., Cao, Y., Xue, Q., Wu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3324726 · Cited by 25
Surveying Multiple Sensitive Attributes using an Extension of the Randomized-Response Technique
Moshagen, M., & Musch, J. (2011) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr034 · Cited by 25
Comparing Population Means Under Local Differential Privacy: With Significance and Power
Ding, B., Nori, H., Li, P., & Allen, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11301 · Cited by 29
Semiparametric analysis of randomized response data with missing covariates in logistic regression
Hsieh, S.-H., Lee, S. M., & Shen, P. (2009) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.01.011 · Cited by 25
SoK: Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis
Hu, Y., Wu, F., Li, Q., Long, Y., Garrido, G. M., Ge, C., Ding, B., Forsyth, D. A., Li, B., & Song, D. X. (2024) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp54263.2024.00002 · Cited by 55
Li, Z., Zeng, X., Xiao, Y., Li, C., Wu, W., & Liu, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2024.3445973 · Cited by 24
Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake Users
Cheu, A., & Zhilyaev, M. (2022) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833614 · Cited by 24
Kenthapadi, K., & Tran, T. T. L. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3269206.3272031 · Cited by 22
A Survey of Randomization Methods for Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · The Kluwer international series on advances in database systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_6 · Cited by 23
Use of a Randomized Response Technique to obtain sensitive information on animal disease prevalence
Cross, P., Edwards‐Jones, G., Omed, H., & Williams, A. P. (2010) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.05.012 · Cited by 22
Randomized response techniques: An application to the Botswana AIDS impact survey
Arnab, R., & Singh, S. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.019 · Cited by 22
A Survey on Methods, Attacks and Metric for Privacy Preserving Data Publishing
Kiran, P., & Kavya, N. P. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/8521-2380 · Cited by 22
The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacy
Mattern, J., Weggenmann, B., & Kerschbaum, F. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.65 · Cited by 49
LDPRecover: Recovering Frequencies from Poisoning Attacks Against Local Differential Privacy
Sun, X., Ye, Q., Hu, H., Duan, J., Wo, T., Xu, J., & Yang, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00132 · Cited by 22
A Survey of Differential Privacy Techniques for Federated Learning
Wang, X., Jiaqian, L., Xueshuang, D., Zhang, H., & Lianshan, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3523909 · Cited by 28
Bagdasaryan, E., Kairouz, P., Mellem, S., Gascón, A., Bonawitz, K., Estrin, D. L., & Gruteser, M. (2022) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2022-0104 · Cited by 38
Providing Private Recommendations Using Naïve Bayesian Classifier
Kaleli, C., & Polat, H. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72575-6_27 · Cited by 21
Estimating the linear regression model with categorical covariates subject to randomized response
van den Hout, A., & Kooiman, P. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.06.008 · Cited by 20
Privacy transformations for statistical information systems
Dalenius, T. (1977) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(77)90007-6 · Cited by 20
Shuffle Differential Private Data Aggregation for Random Population
Wang, S., Luo, X., Qian, Y., Zhu, Y., Chen, K., Chen, Q., Xin, B., & Yang, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2023.3247541 · Cited by 20
Stateful Switch: Optimized Time Series Release with Local Differential Privacy
Ye, Q., Hu, H., Huang, K., Au, M. H., & Xue, Q. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom53939.2023.10229063 · Cited by 20
Measure of privacy in randomized response model
Zhimin, H., & Zaizai, Y. (2012) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9698-z · Cited by 19
Federal Statistics, Multiple Data Sources, and Privacy Protection
Education, D. O. B. A. S. S. A., & National Academies of Sciences, E. (2017) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/24893 · Cited by 19
Security in Sensor Networks: Watermarking Techniques
Wong, J. L., Feng, J., Kirovski, D., et al. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-7884-2_14 · Cited by 19
Bayesian non-randomized response models for surveys with sensitive questions
Tan, M. T., Tang, M., Tian, G., et al. (2009) · Statistics and Its Interface · doi:10.4310/sii.2009.v2.n1.a2 · Cited by 19
From noticing to making sense: Using intelligence to develop strategy
Baumard, P. (1994) · International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence · doi:10.1080/08850609408435236 · Cited by 23
Abortion: a national public and mental health problem-past, present, and proposed research.
Beck, M. B., Newman, S. H., & Lewit, S. (1969) · American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.59.12.2131 · Cited by 19
Transparent Privacy is Principled Privacy
Gong, R. (2022) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.b5d3faaa · Cited by 18
PrivNUD: Effective Range Query Processing under Local Differential Privacy
Wang, N., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Nie, J., Wei, Z., Tang, P., Gu, Y., & Yu, G. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00204 · Cited by 19
A calibration-based approach to sensitive data: a simulation study
Diana, G., & Perri, P. F. (2011) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2011.578615 · Cited by 18
Privacy Preserving Data Publishing for Recommender System
Chen, X., & Huang, V. (2012) · IEEE Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW) · doi:10.1109/compsacw.2012.33 · Cited by 19
Local data debiasing for fairness based on generative adversarial training.
Aïvodji, U., Bidet, F., Gambs, S., Ngueveu, R. C., & Tapp, A. (2021) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a14030087 · Cited by 16
Martins, S., Tiwari, M., Rocha, F., et al. (2022) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-022-09718-7 · Cited by 17
A Hybrid Multi-group Privacy-Preserving Approach for Building Decision Trees
Teng, Z., & Du, W. K. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71701-0_30 · Cited by 17
Generalized franklin's model for randomized response sampling
Singh, S., & Singh, R. (1993) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929308831052 · Cited by 17
On the analysis of some multivariate randomized response designs for categorical data
Bourke, P. D. (1981) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(81)90026-4 · Cited by 17
Hussain, Z., Shabbir, J., & Riaz, M. (2010) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2010.532897 · Cited by 17
Ethical Dilemmas in Social Research
Sieber, J. E. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_1 · Cited by 17
Differentially Private Language Models for Secure Data Sharing
Mattern, J., Jin, Z., Weggenmann, B., Schölkopf, B., & Sachan, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.323 · Cited by 49
A Novel Compliance Assessment Technique: The Randomized Response Interview
Rittenhouse, B. (1996) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462300009843 · Cited by 16
Randomized response and the binary probit model
Ronning, G. (2004) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.013 · Cited by 16
Analyzing Preference Data With Local Privacy: Optimal Utility and Enhanced Robustness
Wang, S., Luo, X., Qian, Y., Du, J., Lin, W., & Yang, W. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3207486 · Cited by 15
Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks Based Differential Privacy Metaverse Data Sharing
Liu, H., Xu, D., Tian, Y., Peng, C., Wu, Z., & Wang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3287092 · Cited by 15
Utilization of higher order moments of scrambling variables in randomized response sampling
Singh, S., & Chen, C. C. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.01.014 · Cited by 15
Contraceptive behaviour of abortion seekers in Sri Lanka
Silva, W. I. D., Dayananda, R. A., & Perera, N. W. P. D. B. N. (2006) · Asian Population Studies · doi:10.1080/17441730500441442 · Cited by 15
Farokhi, F. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2903660 · Cited by 15
Monitoring Harassment in Organizations
Boudreau, L., Chassang, S., González-Torres, A., & Heath, R. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31011 · Cited by 19
Efficient Defenses Against Output Poisoning Attacks on Local Differential Privacy
Song, S., Xu, L., & Zhu, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3305873 · Cited by 15
Secure Multiparty Computation: From Millionaires Problem to Anonymizer
Sheikh, R., Mishra, D. K., & Kumar, B. (2011) · Information Security Journal A Global Perspective · doi:10.1080/19393555.2010.544701 · Cited by 15
The dimensions of locational privacy
Bridwell, S. A. (2007) · The Geojournal library · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5427-0_14 · Cited by 14
A test for detecting untruthful answering in randomized response procedures
Lakshmi, D. V., & Raghavarao, D. (1992) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(92)90144-h · Cited by 14
Purposive concealment of death in household surveys in Misamis Oriental Province
Madigan, F. C., Abernathy, J. R., Herrin, A. N., et al. (1976) · Population Studies · doi:10.1080/00324728.1976.10412736 · Cited by 14
Private Data Analysis via Output Perturbation
Nissim, K. (2008) · The Kluwer international series on advances in database systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_16 · Cited by 14
Estimation of finite population mean in randomized response surveys
Sengupta, S., & Kundu, D. (1989) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(89)90044-x · Cited by 13
Lumos: Heterogeneity-aware Federated Graph Learning over Decentralized Devices
Pan, Q., Zhu, Y., & Chu, L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde55515.2023.00149 · Cited by 14
de Wolf, P. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11930242_17 · Cited by 13
Estimation of a sensitive proportion by Warner’s randomized response data through inverse sampling
Chaudhuri, A., Bose, M., & Dihidar, K. (2009) · Statistical Papers · doi:10.1007/s00362-009-0234-8 · Cited by 13
Nonnegative variance estimation in randomized response surveys
Arnab, R. (1994) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929408831351 · Cited by 13
Barabesi, L. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2007.10.017 · Cited by 13
Corruption, Intimidation, and Whistle-blowing: a Theory of Inference from Unverifiable Reports
Chassang, S., & Miquel, G. P. I. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20315 · Cited by 13
Generating Location Traces With Semantic- Constrained Local Differential Privacy
Sun, X., Ye, Q., Hu, H., Duan, J., Xue, Q., Wo, T., Zhang, W., & Xu, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3480712 · Cited by 12
Privacy Enhancement Via Dummy Points in the Shuffle Model
Li, X., Liu, W., Feng, H., Huang, K., Hu, Y., Liu, J., Ren, K., & Qin, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2023.3263162 · Cited by 12
DP2-Pub: Differentially Private High-Dimensional Data Publication With Invariant Post Randomization
Jiang, H., Yu, H., Cheng, X., Pei, J., Pless, R. B., & Yu, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3265605 · Cited by 12
Perturbation Methods for Protecting Data Privacy: A Review of Techniques and Applications
Turgay, S., & İlter, İ. (2023) · Automation and Machine Learning · doi:10.23977/autml.2023.040205 · Cited by 12
Extremal Mechanisms for Pointwise Maximal Leakage
Grosse, L., Saeidian, S., & Oechtering, T. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3449556 · Cited by 13
A pseudo-empirical log-likelihood estimator using scrambled responses
Singh, S., & Kim, J. (2010) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2010.11.011 · Cited by 12
Residue-based Label Protection Mechanisms in Vertical Logistic Regression
Tan, J., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Li, A., & Wu, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BigCom) · doi:10.1109/bigcom57025.2022.00051 · Cited by 12
Improved Bar-Lev, Bobovitch, and Boukai Randomized Response Models
Odumade, O., & Singh, S. (2009) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610910802536736 · Cited by 12
Chaudhuri, A., Bose, M., & Dihidar, K. (2009) · Statistical Papers · doi:10.1007/s00362-009-0210-3 · Cited by 12
XRand: Differentially Private Defense against Explanation-Guided Attacks
Nguyen, T., Lai, P., Phan, H., & Thai, M. T. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i10.26401 · Cited by 13
Multi-character survery using randomized response technique
Bansal, M. L., Singh, S., & Singh, R. (1994) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929408831348 · Cited by 12
Murrell, P., & Kraay, A. (2013) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-6488 · Cited by 12
An LDP-Based Privacy-Preserving Longitudinal and Multidimensional Range Query Scheme in IoT
Ni, Y., Li, J., Chang, W., & Xiao, J. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3306003 · Cited by 12
Bova, C. S., Potts, W. M., Radford, Z., Schiefer, P., & Hyder, K. (2024) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-024-09908-5 · Cited by 13
Comments on a method of comparison of randomized response techniques
Christofides, T. C. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.018 · Cited by 11
Guillén, J. M. V. (2016) · Universidad de Lima · doi:10.26439/ulima.tesis/3285 · Cited by 11
An Attack-Agnostic Defense Framework Against Manipulation Attacks Under Local Differential Privacy
Zhao, P., Zhang, Z., Dong, J., Wu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, S., & Gao, Y. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00255 · Cited by 11
Machine Learning with Differentially Private Labels: Mechanisms and Frameworks
Tang, X., Nasr, M., Mahloujifar, S., Shejwalkar, V., Song, L., Houmansadr, A., & Mittal, P. (2022) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2022-0112 · Cited by 11
Branković, L., & Giggins, H. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69861-6_12 · Cited by 10
Multi-category parallel models in the design of surveys with sensitive questions
Liu, Y., & Tian, G. (2013) · Statistics and Its Interface · doi:10.4310/sii.2013.v6.n1.a13 · Cited by 10
Yang, S., Xu, J., Yang, X., & Ren, X. (2019) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/ssi-2019-0119 · Cited by 10
Research progress on big data security technology
Chen, X., Gao, Y., Huilin, T., & Du, X. (2020) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/n112019-00077 · Cited by 12
A Study on the Randomized Response Technique by PPS Sampling
Lee, G.-S. (2006) · Korean Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.5351/kjas.2006.19.1.069 · Cited by 10
Preventing Interval-Based Inference by Random Data Perturbation
Li, Y., Wang, L., & Jajodia, S. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36467-6_12 · Cited by 10
Respondent-specific information from the randomized response interview: Compliance assessment
Rittenhouse, B. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00005-4 · Cited by 10
Joint Distribution Analysis for Set-Valued Data With Local Differential Privacy
Huang, Y., Xue, K., Zhu, B., Wei, D. S. L., Sun, Q., & Lu, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3423657 · Cited by 9
Private Collaborative Edge Inference via Over-the-Air Computation
Yilmaz, S. F., Hasırcıoglu, B., Qiao, L., & Gündüz, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2025.3526551 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Warner, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Claremont Graduate University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Warner, Stanley L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1965-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 309
- Pages
- 63-69
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2013823004
- Cited by
- 3,263
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 208 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 96
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- randomized response, sensitive questions, population proportion estimation, maximum likelihood estimation, mean squared error comparison, survey nonresponse
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Sampling Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review