The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias
Abstract
For various reasons individuals in a sample survey may prefer not to confide to the interviewer the correct answers to certain questions. In such cases the individuals may elect not to reply at all or to reply with incorrect answers. The resulting evasive answer bias is ordinarily difficult to assess. In this paper it is argued that such bias is potentially removable through allowing the interviewee to maintain privacy through the device of randomizing his response. A randomized response method for estimating a population proportion is presented as an example. Unbiased maximum likelihood estimates are obtained and their mean square errors are compared with the mean square errors of conventional estimates under various assumptions about the underlying population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing defenses against the targeted backdoor attacks can be categorized into two types: detection methods and erasing methods [150].”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Citations
Cites
Sampling Techniques, Second Edition
G., C. W. (1963)
UnresolvedSome Theory of Sampling
E., D. W. (1950)
UnresolvedSample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I
H., H. M. (1953)
UnresolvedSample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume II
H., H. M. (1953)
UnresolvedSampling Opinions
F., S. F. (1963)
Unresolved
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 584
Estimation of size and mean of a sensitive quantitative variable for a sub-group of a population
Singh, S., angat, N. S., & Singh, R. (1997) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929708832013 · Cited by 4
A New Randomized Response Design for Estimating the Mean of a Distribution
Dalenius, T., & Vitale, R. A. (1979) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9362-4_6 · Cited by 4
Analyzing Hybrid Randomized Response Data with a Binomial Selection Procedure
Jia, F., & McDonald, G. C. (2009) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610920802311717 · Cited by 4
Release of Microdata and Statistical Disclosure Control Techniques
Kim, K.-S. (2009) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2009.16.1.001 · Cited by 4
Karalashvili, N., Kraay, A., & Murrell, P. (2015) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7276 · Cited by 4
Gingerich, D. B. (2014) · doi:10.18235/0009229 · Cited by 4
Hsieh, S., Perri, P. F., & Hoffmann, A. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19819-6 · Cited by 3
Wu, T., Scaglione, A., Ravi, N., et al. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3622650 · Cited by 3
Smart Grid Data Aggregation Scheme Based on Local Differential Privacy
Zhang, L., Mao, D., Chen, Z., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom56396.2022.00219 · Cited by 3
Regression Analysis of Randomized Response Event Time Data
Wen, C., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Statistica Sinica · doi:10.5705/ss.202022.0320 · Cited by 3
Shortest Paths Publishing With Differential Privacy
Cai, B., Sheng, W., Chen, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing · doi:10.1109/tsusc.2023.3329995 · Cited by 3
KSKV: Key-Strategy for Key-Value Data Collection with Local Differential Privacy
Zhao, D., You, Y., Luo, C., et al. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2023.045400 · Cited by 3
Nam, S.-H., Park, H.-Y., & Lee, S.-H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2024.3448475 · Cited by 3
Privacy-Optimized Randomized Response for Sharing Multi-Attribute Data
Yamamoto, A., & Shibuya, T. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications/IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications · doi:10.1109/iscc61673.2024.10733730 · Cited by 3
Quantum Differential Privacy in the Local Model
Angrisani, A., & Kashefi, E. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2025.3552671 · Cited by 8
Private and Effective Range Counting Query Over Evolving Data in Internet of Things
Zhao, P., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3590918 · Cited by 3
On the Price of Differential Privacy for Spectral Clustering Over Stochastic Block Models
Koskela, A., Seif, M., & Goldsmith, A. J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3646341 · Cited by 3
Personalized Differential Privacy Preserving Data Aggregation for Smart Homes
Zhang, X., Huang, L., Wang, S., et al. (2017) · doi:10.2991/icwcsn-16.2017.45 · Cited by 3
Tarr, T. A., & Singh, H. P. (2018) · Trends in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3923/tb.2018.44.55 · Cited by 3
Multiple-Instance Learning From Unlabeled Bags With Pairwise Similarity
Feng, L., Shu, S., Cao, Y., Tao, L., Wei, H., Xiang, T., An, B., & Niu, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3232141 · Cited by 3
Patidar, P., & Singh, H. P. (2023) · Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v19i3.2877 · Cited by 3
Methodological Context and Communication on Data Quality: Discussion of Bailey (2023)
Eltinge, J. L. (2023) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.4e03a698 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the utility of human mobility data under local differential privacy
Ioannou, G., Marchioro, T., Nicolaides, C., Pallis, G., & Markatos, E. P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) · doi:10.1109/mdm61037.2024.00029 · Cited by 3
Low-power and Computing-free Privacy Design for IoT Systems
Sun, H. L., Mooney, K., Renteria-Pinon, M., et al. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI · doi:10.1109/isvlsi61997.2024.00085 · Cited by 3
Private Semantic Communications with Separate Blind Encoders
Zamani, A., & Skoglund, M. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887629 · Cited by 3
Local Differential Privacy for Belief Functions
Li, Q., Zhou, C., Qin, B., & Xu, Z. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21241 · Cited by 5
Two stage randomized response schemes for estimating a multinomial
Hochberg, Y. (1975) · Communications in Statistics · doi:10.1080/03610927508827310 · Cited by 3
A Two-Stage Sequential Sampling Scheme for Warner's Randomized Response Model
Bar‐Lev, S. K., Bobovich, E., & Boukai, B. (2003) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1081/sta-120025384 · Cited by 3
Bayesian Randomized Response as a Class Project
DiPietro, M. (2004) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313004x5455 · Cited by 3
Alternative Estimators for Randomized Response Techniques in Multi-Character Surveys
Arnab, R. (2011) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610921003714188 · Cited by 3
A Comprehensive Survey on Privacy Preserving Big Data Mining
Srijayanthi, S., & Sethukkarasi, R. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research · doi:10.7753/ijcatr0602.1002 · Cited by 3
Data Security and Privacy Preservation in Big Data Age
Yin, M. (2017) · International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering and Information Technology (ICMEIT) · doi:10.2991/icmeit-17.2017.76 · Cited by 4
Improving Estimation Accuracy in Nonrandomized Response Questioning Methods by Multiple Answers
Groenitz, H. (2017) · International Journal of Statistics and Probability · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v6n5p101 · Cited by 3
Bayesian Analysis of Sparse Counts Obtained From the Unrelated Question Design
Nandram, B., & Yu, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Statistics and Probability · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v8n5p66 · Cited by 3
Tarray, T. A., Singh, H. P., & Masood, S. (2019) · Trends in Applied Sciences Research · doi:10.3923/tasr.2019.1.6 · Cited by 3
On Addressing Accuracy Concerns in Privacy Preserving Association Rule Mining
Guo, L., Guo, S., & Wu, X. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68125-0_13 · Cited by 3
Funke, K., Hirschauer, N., Peth, D., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/jnexr · Cited by 3
Cheat, cheat, repeat: On the consistency of dishonest behavior in structurally comparable situationsPreprint
Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., Schild, C., & Heck, D. W. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ntg6c · Cited by 3
Shahzad, U., Zhu, W., Al-Noor, N. H., et al. (2025) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2025.2524552 · Cited by 2
PGB: Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Graph Generation Algorithms
Liu, S., Du, H., Cao, Y., et al. (2025) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00105 · Cited by 2
Privacy-Preserving Verification of ML Preprocessing via Model Behavior Indicators
Li, W., Halimi, A., Vaidya, J. S., Jiang, X., & Ayday, E. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Privacy · doi:10.1109/tp.2025.3628998 · Cited by 2
An information theoretic approach to post randomization methods under differential privacy
Ayed, F., Battiston, M., & Camerlenghi, F. (2020) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-020-09949-3 · Cited by 2
Private Distributed K-Means Clustering on Interval Data
Huang, D., Yao, X., An, S., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference · doi:10.1109/ipccc51483.2021.9679364 · Cited by 2
Sethar, S. H. C. W. A. (2022) · Pakistan Journal of International Affairs · doi:10.52337/pjia.v5i3.601 · Cited by 4
An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Outsourced Heavy Hitter Query Scheme with LDP Technique
Zhang, E. Z., Guan, Y., Zhang, S., Lu, R., & Zhang, H. (2023) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc57788.2023.10233644 · Cited by 2
An Efficient Bloom Filter-based Range Query Scheme Under Local Differential Privacy
Zhang, E. Z., Guan, Y., Lu, R., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc56721.2023.10293855 · Cited by 2
Privacy-Preserving Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation
Lin, Z., Pan, W., & Ming, Z. (2023) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm58522.2023.00138 · Cited by 2
Human-Centered Services Computing for Smart Cities
Murakami, Y., & Kimura, K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0779-9 · Cited by 4
Optimization of transportation efficiency through fuzzy logic and LINGO software
Ganie, Z. A., Khaki, Z. G., Tarray, T. A., et al. (2025) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/5.0252654 · Cited by 2
A Communication-efficient Conjunctive Query Scheme under Local Differential Privacy
Zhang, E. Z., Guan, Y., Lu, R., et al. (2024) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom52923.2024.10901835 · Cited by 2
Multi-Dimensional Data Collection Under Personalized Local Differential Privacy
Song, K., Sun, M., Zhou, K., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00199 · Cited by 2
Ye, Q., Yu, L., Huang, K., Xiao, X., Liu, W., & Hu, H. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00215 · Cited by 2
Chen, C. C., & Singh, S. (2012) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1335845280 · Cited by 2
Statistical Strategies for Preserving Privacy in Direct Inquiry
Boruch, R. F., & Cecil, J. S. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_10 · Cited by 2
Modules in applied mathematics. Vol 2: Political and related models
Tritschler, J. (1983) · Mathematical Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-4896(83)90072-0 · Cited by 2
The Three-Stage Stratified Unrelated Question Model
Lee, G.-S., Hong, K.-H., & Son, C.-K. (2011) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2011.18.4.423 · Cited by 2
Calibration for Randomized Response Estimators
Son, C. K., Kim, J., Hong, K.-H., et al. (2010) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610920903205206 · Cited by 2
Shanmugam (2014) · American Journal of Economics and Business Administration · doi:10.3844/ajebasp.2014.42.48 · Cited by 2
Use of covariates in randomized response settings
Matloff, N. (1984) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/0167-7152(84)90033-6 · Cited by 2
Unrelated Question Model in Sensitive Multi-Character Surveys
Sidhu, S. S., Bansal, M. L., Kim, J., et al. (2009) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2009.16.1.169 · Cited by 2
Bayesian Estimation ofWarner’s Randomized Response Technique with Transmuted Kumaraswamy Prior
Adepetun, A. O., Oseni, B. M., & Makinde, O. S. (2021) · Kuwait Journal of Science · doi:10.48129/kjs.13051 · Cited by 2
Plágio no ensino superior: Mensurar o que os alunos fazem, sabem e julgam saber
Morais, C., Ramos, M., Iscte — Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, C. —. C. D. I. E. E. D. S., et al. (2022) · SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE · doi:10.30553/sociologiaonline.2022.29.4 · Cited by 2
Techniques for Asking Sensitive Questions in Labour Market Surveys
Kirchner, A. (2014) · doi:10.3278/300849w · Cited by 2
How Much User Context Do We Need? Privacy by Design in Mental Health NLP Applications
Sawhney, R., Neerkaje, A. T., Habernal, I., & Flek, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22186 · Cited by 2
Patidar, P., & Singh, H. P. (2022) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.56801/jmasm.v21.i1.4 · Cited by 2
Near-optimal Differentially Private Client Selection in Federated Settings
Alam, S. E., Shukla, D., & Rao, S. (2023) · Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing · doi:10.1109/allerton58177.2023.10313432 · Cited by 2
Improving on the MLE of $p$ for a binomial $(n,p)$ when $p$ is around $\frac 12$
Perron, F. (2003) · Lecture notes-monograph series · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215091930 · Cited by 2
Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation Framework for Mobile Service Based Multiuser Collaboration
Liu, H., Wu, Z., Peng, C., et al. (2019) · The International Arab Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.34028/iajit/17/4/3 · Cited by 2
Comprehensive gain sharing maximizing satisfaction in supply chain collaborations
Kovalenok, A. Y. (2021) · Russian Management Journal · doi:10.21638/spbu18.2021.305 · Cited by 2
Privacy Preserving Clustering for Multi-party
Yang, W., & Huang, S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71703-4_20 · Cited by 2
Lightweight privacy preservation techniques for deep learning and inference in Internet of Things
Jiang, L. (2022) · doi:10.32657/10356/155000 · Cited by 2
Mean Estimation of Scrambled Responses using Systematic SamplingPreprint
Qureshi, M. N., Balqees, S., & Hanif, M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1428946/v1 · Cited by 2
Gehrke, J. E., Kifer, D., & Machanavajjhala, A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5_899 · Cited by 2
Bischof, D., Allinger, T. L., Juratic, M. L. C., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ew95m · Cited by 2
Stochastic Randomized Response Model for a Quantitative Sensitive Random Variable
Singh, S., & Sedory, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1398918240 · Cited by 1
A Privacy-Aware Multi-Preference-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation System with LSH
Wang, X., Yuan, R., Xu, J., et al. (2021) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc-picom-cbdcom-cyberscitech52372.2021.00074 · Cited by 1
Peña, V., & Barrientos, A. F. (2023) · Statistica Sinica · doi:10.5705/ss.202022.0279 · Cited by 1
Toward Answering Federated Spatial Range Queries Under Local Differential Privacy
Feng, G., Wang, G., & Peng, T. (2024) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2024/2408270 · Cited by 1
Yunusa, M. A., & Adejumobi, A. (2024) · Oriental Journal of Physical Sciences · doi:10.13005/ojps09.02.09 · Cited by 1
Lee, G.-S., Hong, K.-H., Kim, S.-H., et al. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13020297 · Cited by 1
Differential Private Data Stream Analytics in the Local and Shuffle Models
Wang, S., Li, J., Peng, Y., Chen, K., Yang, W., Jiang, H. L., & Li, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3559621 · Cited by 1
Generalization and Enhancement of Piecewise Mechanism for Collecting Multidimensional Data
Yamamoto, A., & Shibuya, T. (2024) · doi:10.1109/spaccs63173.2024.00009 · Cited by 1
SoK: What Makes Private Learning Unfair?
Yao, K., & Juarez, M. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00052 · Cited by 6
Avoiding Pitfalls for Privacy Accounting of Subsampled Mechanisms Under Composition
Lebeda, C. J., Regehr, M., Kamath, G., & Steinke, T. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml64287.2025.00060 · Cited by 1
PTES: A Triangle Counting Algorithm with Local Differential Privacy
Li, S., Liu, Z., Kong, H., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033348 · Cited by 1
Zhang, S., Peng, T., Sun, P., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icccs65393.2025.11069575 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Data Release Based on Differential Privacy
Yin, H., Liu, R., Jiang, Y., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11082045 · Cited by 1
Truss Decomposition Under Edge Local Differential Privacy
Zhang, Y., Ni, W., Wang, K., et al. (2025) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00201 · Cited by 1
Cryptographic Commitments on Anonymizable Data
Bultel, X., Chevalier, C., Jojon, C., Liu, D., & Nguyen, B. (2025) · IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/eurosp63326.2025.00037 · Cited by 1
RATR: Optimized Trajectory Release With Temporal Local Differential Privacy
Zhang, S. Z., Ye, Q., Liu, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3636189 · Cited by 1
Cross-Boundary Privacy-Preserving Image Learning
Miyaji, A., Yagishita, T., Hyohdoh, Y., & Boudvillain, P. (2025) · Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust · doi:10.1109/pst65910.2025.11268860 · Cited by 1
Dobrushin Coefficients of Private Mechanisms Beyond Local Differential Privacy
Grosse, L., Saeidian, S., Oechtering, T. J., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit62367.2026.11653807 · Cited by 1
Zhao, P., Zhang, Z., Sun, B., Shen, L., Zhang, L., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2026) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp63933.2026.00054 · Cited by 2
Quatember, A. (2009) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91852-5_24 · Cited by 1
Singh, H. P., & Tarray, T. A. (2015) · Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v11i1.704 · Cited by 1
The Calibration for Two-Phase Randomized Response Estimator
Son, C.-K., Hong, K.-H., Lee, G.-S., et al. (2010) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610920902833545 · Cited by 1
Two-valued response technique of polychotomous sensitive question
Peng, X., & Yan, Z. (2011) · Journal of Systems Science and Complexity · doi:10.1007/s11424-011-8446-0 · Cited by 1
Efficient estimation under privacy restrictions in the disclosure problem
Albers, W. (1984) · Statistics & Probability Letters · doi:10.1016/0167-7152(84)90027-0 · Cited by 1
AliMohammedAl-Yarimi, F., & Minz, S. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/9676-4103 · Cited by 1
XQuery as a data integration language
Rennau, H.-J., & Grün, C. (2015) · Balisage series on markup technologies · doi:10.4242/balisagevol15.rennau01 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Warner, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Claremont Graduate University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Warner, Stanley L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1965-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 309
- Pages
- 63-69
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2013823004
- Cited by
- 3,263
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 208 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 96
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- randomized response, sensitive questions, population proportion estimation, maximum likelihood estimation, mean squared error comparison, survey nonresponse
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Sampling Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review