Cited by 3,263Survey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesSurvey Methodology and NonresponseCensus and Population Estimation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias

Warner, Stanley L.·1965·Journal of the American Statistical Association

DOI 10.2307/2283137

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

For various reasons individuals in a sample survey may prefer not to confide to the interviewer the correct answers to certain questions. In such cases the individuals may elect not to reply at all or to reply with incorrect answers. The resulting evasive answer bias is ordinarily difficult to assess. In this paper it is argued that such bias is potentially removable through allowing the interviewee to maintain privacy through the device of randomizing his response. A randomized response method for estimating a population proportion is presented as an example. Unbiased maximum likelihood estimates are obtained and their mean square errors are compared with the mean square errors of conventional estimates under various assumptions about the underlying population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775

Cites

0 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 5 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sampling Techniques, Second Edition
G., C. W. (1963)
Unresolved
Some Theory of Sampling
E., D. W. (1950)
Unresolved
Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume I
H., H. M. (1953)
Unresolved
Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume II
H., H. M. (1953)
Unresolved
Sampling Opinions
F., S. F. (1963)
Unresolved

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

5 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 584

What Survey Researchers Can Learn From the 2016 U.S. Pre-Election Polls
Terhanian, G. (2017) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2017-025 · Cited by 1
Do Reticent Managers Misreport Data during Firm Surveys? Cross-Checking Reticent Managers’ Answers with Other Information
Clarke, G. R. G. (2017) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2017.1385763 · Cited by 1
A Survey of Data Hiding Techniques
Pathak, K., Silakari, S., & Narendra, S. (2018) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2018918138 · Cited by 1
Regression with Set-Valued Categorical Predictors
Wang, G., Ding, J., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Statistica Sinica · doi:10.5705/ss.202021.0332 · Cited by 1
Improving Estimation Accuracy in Non\-randomized Response Questioning Methods by Multiple Answers
Groenitz, H. (2017) · International Journal of Statistics and Probability · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v6n5p100 · Cited by 1
Performances of Symmetric Loss for Private Data from Exponential Mechanism
Bi, J., & Suppakitpaisarn, V. (2022) · International Symposium on Computing and Networking Workshops (CANDARW) · doi:10.1109/candarw57323.2022.00017 · Cited by 1
Respondent-specific randomized response technique to estimate sensitive proportion
Patra, D., Pal, S., & Chaudhuri, A. (2023) · Statistics in Transition New Series · doi:10.59170/stattrans-2023-051 · Cited by 1
An Efficient Local Differential Privacy Scheme Using Bayesian Ridge Regression
Hernandez-Matamoros, A., & Kikuchi, H. (2023) · International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST) · doi:10.1109/pst58708.2023.10320150 · Cited by 1
A PATE-based Approach for Training Graph Neural Networks under Label Differential Privacy
Huang, H., Luo, L., Zhang, B., et al. (2023) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom54140.2023.10437079 · Cited by 1
Median estimation in the presence of non-response using randomised response technique
Hussain, A., Mahmood, M. S., Mahmood, A., et al. (2023) · Natural and Applied Sciences International Journal (NASIJ) · doi:10.47264/idea.nasij/4.2.7 · Cited by 1
Optimization of UD-LDP with statistical prior knowledge
Thedchanamoorthy, G., Bewong, M., Mohammady, M., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomworkshops59983.2024.10502758 · Cited by 1
6th URV Doctoral Workshop in Computer Science and Mathematics
Autores, V. (2020) · Publicacions URV eBooks · doi:10.17345/9788484248651 · Cited by 1
Randomized response technique in agricultural surveys
Bharti, B., Banerjee, R., Das, P., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.22271/maths.2024.v9.i3sb.1734 · Cited by 1
Nonparametric model-assisted estimation from randomized response survey data
Mostafa, S. A. (2024) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2024.2430743 · Cited by 1
Optimization of Binary Randomized Response Based on Lanke Privacy and Utility Analysis
Zhou, Y., Wang, W., Yan, J., et al. (2025) · Chinese Journal of Electronics · doi:10.23919/cje.2023.00.272 · Cited by 1
Interactive Verifiable Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean Estimation
Wang, L., Liu, L., Zhan, P., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00200 · Cited by 1
Real-time Private Data Aggregation over Distributed Spatial-temporal Infinite Streams with Local Differential Privacy
Xiong, X., Liu, S., Liu, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00188 · Cited by 1
Differentially Private Triangle Counting Assisted by $k$-Anonymity in Two-Party Models
Han, T., Tong, W., & Zhong, S. (2025) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00244 · Cited by 1
Reveal-or-Obscure: A Differentially Private Sampling Algorithm for Discrete Distributions
Tasnim, N., Gilani, A., Sankar, L., et al. (2025) · IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW) · doi:10.1109/itw62417.2025.11240274 · Cited by 1
Information Density Bounds for Privacy
Saeidian, S., Grosse, L., Sadeghi, P., Skoglund, M., & Oechtering, T. J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2025.3637364 · Cited by 1
A modified mixed randomized response model
Singh, H. P., & Tarray, T. A. (2014) · Statistics in Transition New Series · doi:10.59170/stattrans-2014-005 · Cited by 1
Unbiased estimation of variance in multi-stage sampling under randomized response surveys
Arnab, R. (1992) · Statistics · doi:10.1080/02331889208802382 · Cited by 1
Randomized response model in a matched pair study
Wu, C., Wan, S., & Li, M.-C. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2007.08.003 · Cited by 1
Modifications of some simple One-stage Randomized Response Models to Two-stage in complex surveys
Rafiq, M., Hussain, Z., & Akhtar, S. (2016) · Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v12i2.830 · Cited by 1
Simultaneous Estimation of Mean of Sensitive Variable and Sensitivity level by using Generalized Optional Scrambling
Noor‐ul‐Amin, M., Mushtaq, N., & Hanif, M. (2017) · Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v13i4.1966 · Cited by 1
Generalized Family of Estimators for Imputing Scrambled Responses
Sohail, M. U., Shabbir, J., Kadılar, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of the Iranian Statistical Society · doi:10.29252/jirss.17.2.1 · Cited by 1
Performance Comparison of Privacy Preserving Perturbation algorithms in Association Rule Mining
Vigneswari, M., Kumar, N. K., Kumar, G. V., et al. (2018) · doi:10.2991/pecteam-18.2018.1 · Cited by 1
A New Approach to Randomized Response Model Using Fuzzy Numbers
Tarr, T. A., Bilal, P., & Rasool, M. (2017) · Asian Journal of Mathematics & Statistics · doi:10.3923/ajms.2018.1.11 · Cited by 1
The development of telephone interviewing as a tool in marketing research: A survey of the literature
Suchard, H. T. (1985) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v16i3.1088 · Cited by 1
Um Estudo Comparativo de Mecanismos de Privacidade Diferencial sobre um Dataset de Ocorrências do ZIKV no Brasil
de Oliveira, D., Rodrigues, E., Costa, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.5753/sbbd.2019.8832 · Cited by 1
Tax Avoidance in Pakistan: Drivers and Necessary Policy Interventions
Soomro, S. H., Umrani, R. A., & Khowaja, I. A. (2020) · Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review (RJSSER) · doi:10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss4-2020(146-156 · Cited by 1
Diseño y análisis de la violencia de género aplicando la técnica de respuesta aleatoria
Barrionuevo, C. E. M., Barrionuevo, T. P. M., & Santos, D. K. C. (2021) · ConcienciaDigital · doi:10.33262/concienciadigital.v4i1.2.1602 · Cited by 1
Classic Methods in Public Administration Research
Yeager, S. J. (2006) · Public administration and public policy · doi:10.1201/9781420016994.ch25 · Cited by 1
Deneysel İktisatta Yalan Söyleme Davranışının İncelenmesi: Temel Paradigmalar, Bulgular ve Araştırma Hedefleri Üzerine Düşünceler
Giritligil, A. E. (2022) · Istanbul Bilgi University · doi:10.47613/reflektif.2022.63 · Cited by 1
Forced Randomized Response Protocol Using Arbitrary Random Variable
Sungkawichai, T., Thongsata, P., Paka, T., et al. (2022) · Current Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55003/cast.2022.02.23.015 · Cited by 1
Privacidade Diferencial em Sistemas Polystore: uma Abordagem Prática
Bertelli, L., Ströele, V., Machado, J. C., et al. (2022) · doi:10.5753/sbbd.2022.224305 · Cited by 1
DiPPS: Differentially Private Propensity Scores for Bias Correction
Chen, L., Hartmann, V., & West, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22131 · Cited by 1
Searching for Better Randomized Response Schemes for Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
Huang, Z., Du, W. K., & Teng, Z. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74976-9_50 · Cited by 1
An alternative estimator for randomized response sampling with continuous distributions from a dichotomous population
Chua, T. C., & Chiang, K.-L. (1995) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929508831659 · Cited by 1
Examining Social Desirability Bias in Measures of Financial Behavior
Kelly, N. L. (2015) · doi:10.30707/etd2015.kelly.n · Cited by 1
Ein Vergleich randomisierter Antworttechniken bei Ziehen ohne Zurücklegen
Quatember, A., & Freudenthaler, C. (2016) · Austrian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.17713/ajs.v36i3.331 · Cited by 1
Eliciting Accurate Responses to Consumption Questions among Idps in South Sudan Using “Honesty Primes”
Kaplan, L. C., Pape, U. J., & Walsh, J. (2018) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8539 · Cited by 1
Improving Utility and Security of the Shuffler-based Differential PrivacyPreprint
Wang, T., Ding, B., Xu, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.11515 · Cited by 1
Sensitive attitudes and adherence to recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparing direct and indirect questioning techniquesPreprint
Kaufmann, T. H., Lilleholt, L., BOHM, R. M., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tp6ja · Cited by 1
An Analysis of Differential Privacy Research in Location and Trajectory DataPreprint
Errounda, F. Z., & Liu, Y. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-94765/v1 · Cited by 1
The Long-term Impacts of Hunting on Population Viability of Wild Ungulates in Tarangire, Northern Tanzania
Rija, A. A. (2009) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16959247.v1 · Cited by 1
Influences of fisher attitudes and behaviour on regulation non-compliance: A case study from the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand recreational blue cod fishery
Thomas, A. S. (2015) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17009471 · Cited by 1
Ethical and Methodological Considerations for Gender Researchers in Forensic Psychology
Heard, K. V. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_25 · Cited by 1
An Dynamic Optimal Allocation for the Stratified Randomized Response Technique
Son, C.-K., Hong, K.-H., & Lee, G.-S. (2009) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2009.16.4.595
A Closed-Form Bayesian Inferences for Multinomial Randomized Response Model
Heo, T., & Kim, J. (2007) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2007.14.1.121
Forecasting Probability of Precipitation Using Morkov Logistic Regression Model
Park, J., & Kim, Y.-S. (2007) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2007.14.1.001
A Privacy Protection Scheme for a Scalable Control Method in Context-Dependent Services
Yoshida, R., Shigetomi, R., Yoshizoe, K., et al. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88353-1_1
Logistic Randomized Response Model
Yan, Z., & Ji, P.-H. (2009) · Advances in soft computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88914-4_38
Confidentiality guaranteed: a noninvasive procedure for collecting sensitive information
Chatterjee, S., & Simon, G. (1993) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929308831107
C347. Random-response questionnaires and lie-detectors
Good, I. J. (1990) · Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation · doi:10.1080/00949659008811222
The Design of Scoring Schemes for Surveys Using the Block Total Response Method
Smith, N. F. (2005) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/sta-200066372
To pool or not to pool the proportion in randomized response surveys
Ahmed, S. E. (1997) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929708832062
Limiting Attribute Disclosure in Randomization Based Microdata Release
Guo, L., Ying, X., & Wu, X. (2011) · Journal of Computing Science and Engineering · doi:10.5626/jcse.2011.5.3.169
Effects of Response Errors on Population Parameters in Double Sampling for Stratification
Alilah, D. A. (2015) · Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.sjams.20150302.11
Conducting Meaningful Surveys
Wan, M. (2013) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16069-17
El modelo de respuesta no aleatorizada: una aplicación del modelo paralelo
Dávíla, O. L. S., & Liñan, M. H. R. (2016) · Pesquimat · doi:10.15381/pes.v18i1.12508
El modelo de respuesta no aleatorizada transversal: una aplicación
Solano, O. B., & Galván, J. (2016) · Pesquimat · doi:10.15381/pes.v19i1.12513
The Three-Stage Cluster Randomized Response Model for Obtaining Sensitive Information
Lee, G. S., Hong, K.-H., Son, C. K., et al. (2003) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.5351/ckss.2003.10.1.247
Estimation of a Proportion: Sub Sampling the Non Response Stratum
y Computación, U. D. L. H. F. D. M., & Bouza, C. N. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Statistics · doi:10.22606/jas.2016.11003
New Mathematical Strategy Using Branch and Bound Method
Tarray, T. A., & Bhat, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Multiscale Modelling · doi:10.1142/s1756973717500056
Use of Two Variables Having Common Mean to Improve the Bar-Lev, Bobovitch and Boukai Randomized Response Model
Odumade, O., & Singh, S. (2010) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1288584540
Extensions of Some Randomized Response Procedures Related with Gupta-Thornton Method
Bouza-Herrera, C. N. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815044-3.00006-x
A stratified estimation of a sensitive character by using geometric distribution
Lee, G.-S., Hong, K.-H., Son, C.-K., et al. (2019) · Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610926.2019.1586939
Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Directory Services
Tang, Y., Li, K., Areekijseree, K., et al. (2019) · ICST Transactions on Security and Safety · doi:10.4108/eai.29-7-2019.159627
Randomized Item Count Model and Its Comparison with Simon's Randomized Model
Alavi, S. M. R., Nayyeri, S., & Akhoond, M. R. (2019) · Journal of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.29252/jss.13.2.497
Privacy Protection for Multi-Option Problem of Partici-patory Sensing Using Random Noise Addition
Hayakawa, T., Hochin, T., & Matsuo, T. (2019) · International Journal of Service and Knowledge Management · doi:10.52731/ijskm.v3.i2.442
Efficient Collaborations in Supply Chains
Verena, J. (2020) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20200520vj
Improving Frequency Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyPreprint
Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg, M., Li, Z., Škorić, B., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.10499
Inductive learning and local differential privacy for privacy-preserving offloading in mobile edge intelligent systemsPreprint
Tchaye-Kondi, J., Zhai, Y., & Zhu, L. (2021) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.13698883.v2
OSM-DSSE: A Searchable Encryption Scheme with Hidden Search Patterns and Access PatternsPreprint
Liu, H., Xue-qin, L., Guo, E., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-253711/v1
Uncertainty Quantification Techniques in Statistics
Kim, J. (2020) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03928-547-1
Privacy Preserving Technique for Data Storage in Cloud Computing
Kaur, J., & Goel, N. (2018) · Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology · doi:10.51983/ajeat-2018.7.2.1007
An alternative approach for construction of strata using quantified sensitivity level
Agegnehu, D., Mahajan, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2021) · Journal of Applied and Natural Science · doi:10.31018/jans.v13i3.2679
A Randomized Response Technique for Reducing the Effect of Initial Non-response of the Regression Estimator in Panel SurveysPreprint
Khan, M. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-656140/v1
Partial optional randomized response technique with calibration weighting to adjust non-response in successive sampling
Priyanka, K., Trisandhya, P., & Kumar, A. (2021) · Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods · doi:10.29220/csam.2021.28.5.493
Privacy-preserving of patients with Differential Privacy: an experimental evaluation in COVID-19 dataset
Filho, M. E. B., Neto, E. R. D., & Machado, J. C. (2021) · Journal of Information and Data Management · doi:10.5753/jidm.2021.1947
Measuring the Non-Observed Economy: A Survey-Based Study of Demand in the Korean Prostitution Market
Kim, W. (2013) · Berkeley Undergraduate Journal · doi:10.5070/b3261016119
Bibliography
Dubey, U., Kothari, D. P., & Awari, G. K. (2016) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315367187-19
References
Fuller, W. A. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470523551.refs
Appendix
(2005) · Statistics, a series of textbooks and monographs · doi:10.1201/9781420028638.ax1
References
Chaudhuri, A. (2010) · Statistics, a series of textbooks and monographs · doi:10.1201/b10476-12
Ethical Considerations in Data Collection
Hubert, L. (2012) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b13103-23
References
Meinert, C. L. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118315293.refs
Palm Oil and Rubber Price and Trader’s Behavior at International towards Local Level
Sujarwo, R. M. (2021) · doi:10.53846/goediss-8672
Comparative Appraisal of Randomized Response Technique vs. Direct Interview Method in Assessment of Burden of Tobacco and Alcohol Use among Adolescents in IndiaPreprint
Upadhyay, A. D., Dwivedi, S. N., Dhawan, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-44962/v1
E-research – selected issues concerning the Internet attitudes and opinions research
Kulikowski, K. (2015) · e-mentor · doi:10.15219/em62.1211
Using the Randomized Response Technique to Investigate Illegal Fishing and Contribute to Abalone Management in Northern California
Blank, S. G. (2008) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16959010
Vol. 13, No. 1 (Full Issue)
Editor, S. S. (2014) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1398918780
Vol. 4, No. 2 (Full Issue)
Editors, J. (2005) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1130805060
Vol. 9, No. 2 (Full Issue)
Editors, J. (2010) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1288585740
Inductive learning and local differential privacy for privacy-preserving offloading in mobile edge intelligent systemsPreprint
Tchaye-Kondi, J., Zhai, Y., & Zhu, L. (2021) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.13698883.v1
Political Identity: Experimental Evidence on Anti-Americanism in Pakistan
Bursztyn, L., Ferman, B., Callen, M. J., et al. (2017) · AEA Randomized Controlled Trials · doi:10.1257/rct.2024-1.0
Vol. 5, No. 2 (Full Issue)
Editors, J. (2005) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1162355640
Social Science Methods to Study Human–Cheetah InteractionsPreprint
Rust, N. A., & Hughes, C. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/gjsm8
A Non-Reversible Privacy Preservation Model for Outsourced High-Dimensional Healthcare DataPreprint
Bukhari, S. U. K., Qureshi, A., Anjum, A., & Shah, M. A. (2021) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.15169089

Authors: Warner, S. L.
Affiliations: Claremont Graduate University (US)
Corresponding author: Warner, Stanley L.
Venue: Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 1965-03
Volume: 60
Issue: 309
Pages: 63-69
ISSN: 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
1537-274X
DOI: 10.2307/2283137
OpenAlex: W2013823004
Cited by: 3,263
References: 5
Citations by year: 2026: 135 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 219 · 2020: 208 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 151 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 96
FWCI: 2.27
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
Keywords: randomized response, sensitive questions, population proportion estimation, maximum likelihood estimation, mean squared error comparison, survey nonresponse
MeSH terms: Data Collection, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Sampling Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks