The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Dynamics: Models and Methods.
Abstract
This book attempts to provide a broad framework for thinking about and conducting quantitative empirical studies of social change processes. The goals of this book are 1) to clarify and develop models and methods for causal analysis of dynamic social processes 2) to formulate continuous-time models of change in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes and to develop suitable methods for estimating these models from the kinds of data commonly available to sociologists 3) to develop a stochastic framework for analyzing both qualitative and quantitative outcomes and 4) to alter the way that sociologists think about the empirical study of social change processes. Part I provides general background for what follows; it includes both a discussion of the substantive importance of dynamic analyses in sociology and a review of models and methods previously used by sociologists interested in the empirical study of social dynamics. Part II contains 8 chapters on models and methods for anallyzing change in qualitative outcomes; it concentrates mainly on methods based on analysis of event-history data. Part III contains 6 chapters on comprable models and methods for analyzing change in quantitative outcomes; it focuses primarily on methods based on analysis of panel data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256404 · Cited by 4,519
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666998 · Cited by 2,751
Metadata
- Authors
- Bye, B. V., Hennessey, J. C., Tuma, N. B., & Hannan, M. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 391
- Pages
- 775
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035977433
- Cited by
- 1,062
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2288506
- The paper
- Bye, B. V., Hennessey, J. C., Tuma, N. B., & Hannan, M. T. (1985). Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.