Cited by 4,519Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Management and InnovationEmployee Performance and Management

PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT.

O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., Caldwell, D. F.·1991·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

This article brings together three current themes in organizational behavior: (1) a renewed interest in assessing person-situation interactional constructs, (2) the quantitative assessment of organizational culture, and (3) the application of “Q-sort,” or template-matching, approaches to assessing person-situation interactions. Using longitudinal data from accountants and M.B.A. students and cross-sectional data from employees of government agencies and public accounting firms, we developed and validated an instrument for assessing person-organization fit, the Organizational Culture Profile (OCP). Results suggest that the dimensionality of individual preferences for organizational cultures and the existence of these cultures are interpretable. Further, person-organization fit predicts job satisfaction and organizational commitment a year after fit was measured and actual turnover after two years. This evidence attests to the importance of understanding the fit between individuals' preferences and organiza...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fit, attunement, or a match between individuals and their environment or cultures confers benefits in many domains.

    “Fit, attunement, or a match between individuals and their environment or cultures confers benefits in many domains (e.g., O’Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell, 1991; Stephens, Markus, & Fryberg, 2012).”

    From Culture and Healthy Eating: The Role of Independence and Interdependence in the United States and Japan (2016) · cites this paper as O’Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell, 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Santa Clara University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1991-09-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
487-516
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2131576002
Cited by
4,519
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 172 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 220 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 242 · 2015: 212 · 2014: 218 · 2013: 232 · 2012: 232
FWCI
38.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
person-organization fit, organizational culture, Organizational Culture Profile, Q-sort, template matching, person-situation interaction, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover, accounting firms, public accounting, MBA students, public sector employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review