The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior.
Abstract
It is the rare book that remains in print for nearly fifty years, earning wide acclaim as a classic. The Forest Ranger has been essential reading for generations of professionals and scholars in forestry, public administration, and organizational behavior who are interested in the administration of public lands and how the top managers of a large, dispersed organization with multiple objectives like the Forest Service shape the behavior of its field officers into a coherent, unified program. Published as a special reprint in conjunction with the 100th anniversary of the U.S. Forest Service, The Forest Ranger is as relevant and timely today as when it was first issued in 1960. In addition to the original text, this special reprint of The Forest Ranger includes two new forewords and an afterword that highlight how much we have learned from Herbert Kaufman. The first foreword, by Harold K. (Pete) Steen, former president of the Forest History Society, considers the book's impact on the forestry community and explains its continued relevance in light of changes in the culture and mission of today's Forest Service. The second, by Richard P. Nathan, codirector of the Rockefeller Institute of Government, considers the book's contribution to our understanding of administrative and organizational behavior. The new afterword by author Herbert Kaufman describes how his landmark study came into being and offers a candid assessment of how his theories about the agency's operations and its future have held up over time. In 1960, the Forest Service had a well-deserved reputation for excellence, and The Forest Ranger was a seminal analysis of the hows and whys of its success. Kaufmanalso warned, however, that an organization so unified and well adapted to its environment would have difficulties navigating social change. He was right in his concerns: the environmental, civil rights, and women's movements have all presented challenges to the character and purpose of the Forest Service, ultimately changing the organization in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. Now, as then, The Forest Ranger is a striking and prescient case study of how a complex organization operates and evolves over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms
Ouchi, W. G. (1979) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · Cited by 3,707
What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions
ROTHSTEIN, B., & TEORELL, J. (2008) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x · Cited by 1,446
Reputation and Public Administration
Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x · Cited by 549
Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4 · Cited by 441
Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, R. C., & Kaufman, H.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1961-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159979886
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2390746
- The paper
- Martin, R. C., & Kaufman, H. (1961). The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.