The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests.

Guion, Robert M., Ghiselli, Edwin E.·1967·Administrative Science Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/2391224

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2391224

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72 · Cited by 2,107
Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 · Cited by 769
The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta‐analysis
Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2005) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317905x26994 · Cited by 206
Development and test of a new model for validity generalization.
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.543 · Cited by 112
Race and Cognitive‐Ability Test Performance: The Mediating Effects of Test Preparation, Test‐Taking Strategy Use and Self‐Eff icacy
ELLIS, A. P. J., & RYAN, A. M. (2003) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02783.x · Cited by 40

Authors: Guion, R. M., & Ghiselli, E. E.
Venue: Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1967-06
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 189
ISSN: 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2391224
OpenAlex: W1969319364
Cited by: 369
References: 0
FWCI: 15.90
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review