The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting Organizational Effectiveness With a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership
Abstract
Recent research in the area of leadership seems to point to the existence of four basic dimensions of leadership: support, interaction facilitation, goal emphasis, and work facilitation. Data from a recent study of 40 agencies of one of the leading life insurance companies are used to evaluate the impact of both supervisory and peer leadership upon outcomes of satisfaction and factorial performance measures. Results from the study suggest that this conceptual model is useful and that leadership's relation to organizational outcomes may best be studied when both leadership and effectiveness are multidimensional. Both peer and supervisory leadership measures relate to outcomes. In most instances, the ability to predict is enhanced by taking simultaneous account of certain nonleadership variables. David G. Bowers is program associate at the Center for Research on the Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, The University of Michigan. Stanley E. Seashore is professor of psychology and assistant director of the Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Research.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36 · Cited by 1,265
A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations
Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2000) · Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context · doi:10.1057/9780230511590_5 · Cited by 1,045
A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190200900102 · Cited by 951
Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030264 · Cited by 657
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007 · Cited by 640
Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation
Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-u · Cited by 580
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005 · Cited by 440
Leadership Complexity and Development of the leaderplex Model
Hooijberg, R., (Jerry) Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300305 · Cited by 339
Leadership Styles: A Comprehensive Assessment and Way Forward
Fischer, T., & Sitkin, S. B. (2023) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0340 · Cited by 303
Implicit leadership theories: defining leaders described as worthy of influence
Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672962211004 · Cited by 164
Kim, D., Moon, C. W., & Shin, J. (2018) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-06-2017-0173 · Cited by 86
Servant Leadership in the Workplace
Kohntopp, T., & McCann, J. (2018) · The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62163-0_11 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1966-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328219772
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
