Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Prediction Study

Marsh, Robert M., Mannari, Hiroshi·1977·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

Data were collected and analyzed with support from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Social Science Research Council, Brown University, and Kwansei Gakuin University. We alone are responsible for the conclusions drawn. Help received from individuals in both Japan and the United States has been acknowledged in an earlier publication (Marsh and Mannari, 1976).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2391746

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Marsh, R. M., & Mannari, H.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1977-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
57
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997971610
Cited by
364
References
0
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Prediction Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2391746
The paper
Marsh, R. M., & Mannari, H. (1977). Organizational Commitment and Turnover: A Prediction Study. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391746

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.