The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interorganizational Relationships: Patterns and Motivations
Abstract
June 1977, volume 22 Two competing approaches-exchange and powerdependency-have been used in previous studies to conceptualize interorganizational relationships. The basic premise of this paper is that an integrated view of these relationships is needed that incorporates propositions from both of these approaches. Propositions are developed from these two approaches for explaining variations in the frequency of interaction and the nature of interactions between pairs of organizations in an interorganizational set. Special emphasis is given to the nature of interactions in an asymmetrical relationship. The propositions are tested using data on interactions between community organizations and local offices of the United States Training and Employment Service. The results suggest that interorganizational relationships should be conceptualized as a mixed-motive situation in which each organization behaves in accordance with its own self-interests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00037-9 · Cited by 2,750
Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions
Oliver, C. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4308156 · Cited by 2,408
Collaboration theory and community tourism planning
Jamal, T. B., & Getz, D. (1995) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/0160-7383(94)00067-3 · Cited by 1,640
Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600201 · Cited by 1,337
Manufacturer-Overseas Distributor Relations and export Performance
Rosson, P. J., & Ford, I. D. (1982) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490550 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, S. M., & Kochan, T. A.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 220
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090975332
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interorganizational Relationships: Patterns and Motivations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2391957
- The paper
- Schmidt, S. M., & Kochan, T. A. (1977). Interorganizational Relationships: Patterns and Motivations. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.