The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationships Between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative Frameworks
Abstract
Greg R. Oldham, J. Richard Hackman, Relationships Between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative Frameworks, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar., 1981), pp. 66-83
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393414 · Cited by 1,014
SLBS-6: Validation of a Short Form of the Servant Leadership Behavior Scale
Sendjaya, S., Eva, N., Butar Butar, I., Robin, M., & Castles, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3594-3 · Cited by 172
Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct
Feldman, G. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12293 · Cited by 106
Problems at work: Exploring the correlates of role stress among correctional staff
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Tucker, K. A. (2009) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032885509351006 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033635676
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
