The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.
Abstract
Long a fruitful area of scrutiny for students of organizations, the study of institutions is undergoing a renaissance in contemporary social science. This volume offers, for the first time, both often-cited foundation works and the latest writings of scholars associated with the approach to organization analysis. In their introduction, the editors discuss points of convergence and disagreement with institutionally oriented research in economics and political science, and locate the approach in relation to major developments in contemporary sociological theory. Several chapters consolidate the theoretical advances of the past decade, identify and clarify the paradigm's key ambiguities, and push the theoretical agenda in novel ways by developing sophisticated arguments about the linkage between institutional patterns and forms of social structure. The empirical studies that follow—involving such diverse topics as mental health clinics, art museums, large corporations, civil-service systems, and national polities—illustrate the explanatory power of institutional theory in the analysis of organizational change. Required reading for anyone interested in the sociology of organizations, the volume should appeal to scholars concerned with culture, political institutions, and social change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–107 of 107
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Conceptualizing Power in Organizations
Vallas, S. P., & Hill, A. (2012) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2012)0000034009 · Cited by 37
“Creative Financing”: Funding Evidence-Based Interventions in Human Service Systems
Jaramillo, E. T., Willging, C. E., Green, A. E., Gunderson, L. M., Fettes, D. L., & Aarons, G. A. (2019) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-018-9644-5 · Cited by 33
Kerins, C., McHugh, S., McSharry, J., Reardon, C. M., Hayes, C., Perry, I. J., Geaney, F., Seery, S., & Kelly, C. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00948-1 · Cited by 30
“While it is recognised that regulation is required to advance public health [19, 38, 103], the risk of tokenism, that is the superficial implementation of menu labelling, in response to regulation needs to be averted [102].”
BackgroundResultAn explication of treatment ideology among mental health care providers
Scheid, T. L. (1994) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11348763 · Cited by 18
Median Problem Pressure and Policy Learning: An Exploratory Analysis of European Countries
Trein, P. (2018) · International Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_11 · Cited by 7
(2012) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, A. O., Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124423022
- Cited by
- 8,261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 159.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.