The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies.
Abstract
This is a reprint of a classic work of research on innovation first published in 1989. Resulting from the Minnesota Innovation Research Program (MIRP), the book includes a revised and expanded Preface and will complement the three other books growing out of the program, all published by Oxford: The Innovation Journey (1999), Organizational Change Processes: Theory and Methods for Research (2000), and Handbook of Organizational Change and Development (coming 2001).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267 · Cited by 4,221
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Self-citationAnderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour
Janssen, O. (2000) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317900167038 · Cited by 2,816
Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 · Cited by 1,489
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x · Cited by 1,296
Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 · Cited by 1,173
The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process
Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x · Cited by 1,102
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.236 · Cited by 1,035
A guide to knowledge translation theory
Estabrooks, C. A., Thompson, D. S., Lovely, J. J. E., & Hofmeyer, A. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.48 · Cited by 435
Implicating trust in the innovation process†
Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317902321119574 · Cited by 289
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606068338 · Cited by 219
Ash, J. (1997) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040102 · Cited by 174
Implementation research: state of the art and future directions
Linton, J. D. (2002) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00075-x · Cited by 126
The role of transformational leadership in innovation performance of Malaysian SMEs
Tajasom, A., Hung, D. K. M., Nikbin, D., & Hyun, S. S. (2015) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2015.1074513 · Cited by 86
When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors
Schaubroeck, J. M., & Yu, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauptman, O., Nohria, N., de Ven, A. H. V., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 314
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063276269
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
