Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some support has already been published for the major precepts of ambidexterity theory.
“Some support has already been published for the major precepts of ambidexterity theory (Rosing, Frese, & Bausch, 2011), and this perspective therefore holds potential for future studies most notably into leadership effects in innovation processes.”
From Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework (2014) · cites this paper as Rosing, Frese, & Bausch, 2011
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 6× · see citing works
“risk taking; exploitation is linked to reducing variance, adherence to rules, alignment, and risk avoidance (March, 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737 · see citing works
Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership
Bass, B. M. (1999) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/135943299398410 · Cited by 3,254 · see citing works
CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY: ITS POTENTIAL ANTECEDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO CREATIVE PERFORMANCE.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069429 · Cited by 2,787 · see citing works
The Forgotten Ones? The Validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in Leadership Research.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00144-3 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200103 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Implicating trust in the innovation process†
Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317902321119574 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches
King, N. (1992) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00487.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103 · see citing works
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
When Is More Uncertainty Better? A Model of Uncertainty Regulation and Effectiveness
Griffin, M. A., & Grote, G. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0271 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Lei, H., Gui, L., & Le, P. B. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0247 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
The unseen burden: How ambidextrous leadership erodes managers' well-being
Jia, J., Liu, W., Zhang, S. X., & Luo, W. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114802 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A.
- Affiliations
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rosing, Kathrin
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 956-974
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103750534
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 103 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 43.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- ambidextrous leadership, leadership and innovation, exploration and exploitation, innovation process, team innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
