The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structure of Organizational Incentives
Abstract
0 The financial support of Peat Marwick Main & Co., Ernst & Young, David Hauck, and the Reginald H. Jones Center for Management Policy, Strategy, and Organization is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Sherwin Rosen, Stanley Baiman, Marshall Meyer, three anonymous reviewers, and the workshop participants at the Wharton School, Harvard Business School, Washington University, Northwestern University, Odense University, Uppsala University, and the Shore Conference on Strategic Models for their helpful comments. To improve understanding and design of organizational incentives, we used confidential compensation data obtained for four distinct organizational levels (ranging from plant manager to corporate chief executive officer) to evaluate the ability of tournament, managerial power, and agency theories to explain these observed compensation data. Our results suggest that organizational incentives are most appropriately characterized by a combination of these models, rather than being completely described by a single theoretical description.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
Cited by
Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance
Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00058-0 · Cited by 4,335
Self-citationThe Provision of Incentives in Firms
Prendergast, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7 · Cited by 3,338
COLLABORATION IN THE BOARDROOM: BEHAVIORAL AND PERFORMANCE CONSEQUENCES OF CEO-BOARD SOCIAL TIES.
Westphal, J. D. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256871 · Cited by 1,208
Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance
Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.253302 · Cited by 849
Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert, R. A., Larcker, D. F., & Weigelt, K.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007087334
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Structure of Organizational Incentives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393375
- The paper
- Lambert, R. A., Larcker, D. F., & Weigelt, K. (1993). The Structure of Organizational Incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.