The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations
Abstract
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1994 American Sociological Meetings, Los Angeles. This research was funded by the Alberta Law Foundation (Grant #6035) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Award #725-91-3002), and assistance was provided by the Law Society of Alberta. I wish to thank Charles W. Mueller for his helpful suggestions and advice on earlier drafts of this paper. This paper has also benefited greatly from the insightful and constructive comments of the editor, Stephen R. Barley, and the Managing Editor, Linda J. Pike, as well as the feedback provided by the three anonymous ASQ reviewers. This study of lawyers examines the degree to which professionals in general and lawyers in particular are committed to their profession and the organizations that employ them. I examine how the different structural arrangements of professional and nonprofessional organizations relate to lawyers' organizational and professional commitment. Results show that organizational commitment is highly dependent on perceived opportunities for career advancements and the criteria used in the distribution of rewards. Few of the structural characteristics are important in explaining professional commitment, and lawyers working in nonprofessional organizations are significantly less committed to the legal profession than those working in professional organizations. The results of this study suggest that future research must look beyond the structural characteristics of professionals' work settings if we want to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting professional commitment.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of job and work involvement
Kanungo, R. N. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341 · Cited by 1,718
Cited by
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786060 · Cited by 1,973
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 · Cited by 1,226
Loi, R., Hang‐Yue, N., & Foley, S. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317905x39657 · Cited by 668
Joseph, D., Ng, K.-Y., Koh, C., & Ang, S. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148807 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, J. E.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312864901
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393637
- The paper
- Wallace, J. E. (1995). Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.