The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Discipline of Teams: The Control of Team-Based Industrial Work Through Electronic and Peer Surveillance
Abstract
Graham Sewell, The Discipline of Teams: The Control of Team-Based Industrial Work through Electronic and Peer Surveillance, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 2, Special Issue: Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control (Jun., 1998), pp. 397-428
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Management paradoxes: A relational view
Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726702555001 · Cited by 498
Work organization and ergonomics
Carayon, P., & Smith, M. J. (2000) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00040-5 · Cited by 448
Newlands, G. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840620937900 · Cited by 439
Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615593587 · Cited by 369
Self-citationDecaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Contu, A. (2008) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318907310941 · Cited by 335
The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work
Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998105 · Cited by 171
Follow the Redbrick Road: Reflections on Pathways in and out of the Labor Process Debate
Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2000) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2000.11656799 · Cited by 99
The New ‘Hidden Abode’: Reflections on Value and Labour in the New Economy
Böhm, S., & Land, C. (2012) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02071.x · Cited by 96
Ajunwa, I. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720938093 · Cited by 72
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Conceptualizing Power in Organizations
Vallas, S. P., & Hill, A. (2012) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2012)0000034009 · Cited by 37
Automatons, sales-floor control and the constitution of authority
Darr, A. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718783818 · Cited by 17
(2007) · London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Sewell, G.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090036607
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 165.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
