Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field Boundary Vegetation and the Effects of Agrochemical Drift: Botanical Change Caused by Low Levels of Herbicide and Fertilizer

Open access
Kleijn, David, Snoeijing, G. Ineke J.·1997·The Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

To assess the effects of herbicide drift and fertilizer misplacement on the botanical diversity of arable field boundary vegetation, plots in (i) a low productive meadow, and (ii) a high productive fallow arable field sown with a mixture of grassland forbs were treated annually with all combinations of three levels of fertilizer (NPK; 0, 25 and 50% of the standard agricultural dose) and four levels of herbicide (fluroxypyr; 0, 5, 10 and 50%). Botanical change and biomass production of grasses and forbs were monitored for 3 years in both experiments. Additionally, phytotoxicity of the four levels of herbicide was screened at the seedling stage for 18 species grown in pots in a glasshouse. In both vegetation types, fertilizer application resulted in a decline in species richness through a loss of species of low stature. Fertilizer application affected species-richness gradually, as demonstrated by the rare occurrence of significant effects on colonization and extinction rates. Herbicide application resulted in a decline in species richness and affected biomass production of both grasses (positively) and forbs (negatively) in the high productive fallow only. However, a small number of species decreased in abundance in the herbicide-treated plots in both experiments. Significant herbicide effects were mainly limited to the 50% herbicide plots, but the 5 and 10% herbicide levels decreased the biomass production of spontaneously colonizing forbs and increased the species extinction rates in individual years. The effects of the fertilizer applications on species-richness, biomass production and the abundance of individual species were far more severe and constant compared to the herbicide applications. The results of the pot experiment did not correspond well with the results of the field experiments. Extrapolation of the results of pot experiments to normal field conditions is therefore difficult and inappropriate. The implications of these results for field boundary management are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2405258

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Kleijn, D., & Snoeijing, G. I. J.
Venue
The Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1413
ISSN
0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049007394
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Boundary Vegetation and the Effects of Agrochemical Drift: Botanical Change Caused by Low Levels of Herbicide and Fertilizer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2405258
The paper
Kleijn, D., & Snoeijing, G. I. J. (1997). Field Boundary Vegetation and the Effects of Agrochemical Drift: Botanical Change Caused by Low Levels of Herbicide and Fertilizer. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.