Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives

Antle, Rick, Smith, Abbie·1986·Journal of Accounting Research
DOI 10.2307/2490802
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Relative performance evaluation, Firm performance, Peer group evaluation, Corporate executives

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2490802

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 677

Metadata

Authors
Antle, R., & Smith, A.
Venue
Journal of Accounting Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1986
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2490802
OpenAlex
W2007094459
Cited by
677
References
23
FWCI
29.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2490802
The paper
Antle, R., & Smith, A. (1986). An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490802

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.