The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-User Personnel: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements
Abstract
One of the fundamental issues inherent to both practice and academia emanates from the need to know what knowledge and skills personnel must possess to successfully perform their jobs. This article addresses this issue by performing an educational needs assessment, one that considers the deficiencies of both IS and end-user personnel. To this end, an instrument has been developed, tested, and completed by 275 employees within eight different organizations. The findings of this study suggest that among six different knowledge and skill areas, both IS and end-user personnel are most deficient in the area of “general IS knowledge“ (e.g., IS policies and plans, fit between IS and organization, etc.). In addition, IS personnel appear to be in need of more “organizationalknowledge“(e.g., organizational goals and objectives, critical success factors, etc.). End users, on the other hand, seem to require more IS-related skills (e.g., data access, use of software packages, etc.). The implications of these findings for practitioners and academicians focus on finding ways to improve the education and training programs currently in place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis.
Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.67.3.280 · Cited by 973
Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Zmud, R. W. (1979) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966 · Cited by 836
Toward an hypothesis of work behavior.
Korman, A. K. (1970) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0028656 · Cited by 758
Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s
Niederman, F., Brancheau, J. C., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1991) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249452 · Cited by 725
The management of end user computing
Rockart, J. F., & Flannery, L. S. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358413.358429 · Cited by 497
The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training1
Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1990) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249313 · Cited by 424
Cited by
EVERARD, A., & GALLETTA, D. F. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222220303 · Cited by 451
Thatcher, J. B., McKnight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R. E., & Roberts, N. H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2009.2028320 · Cited by 196
When the wait isn’t so bad: The interacting effects of website delay, familiarity, and breadth
Galletta, D. F., Henry, R. M., McCoy, S., & Polak, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0073 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, R. R.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 503-525
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1561838558
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 19.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-User Personnel: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249454
- The paper
- Nelson, R. R. (1991). Educational Needs as Perceived by IS and End-User Personnel: A Survey of Knowledge and Skill Requirements. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.