Cited by 196Technology Adoption and User BehaviourKnowledge Management and SharingInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The Role of Trust in Postadoption IT Exploration: An Empirical Examination of Knowledge Management Systems

Thatcher, Jason Bennett, McKnight, D. Harrison, Baker, Elizabeth White, Arsal, Riza Ergun, Roberts, Nicholas H.·2011·IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Abstract

In this study, we examine trust in information technology's (IT) relationship with postadoption exploration of knowledge management systems (KMS). We introduce and distinguish between trust in IT and trust in IT support staff as object-specific beliefs that influence technology's infusion into organizations. We suggest that these object-specific beliefs' influence on intention to explore KMS is mediated by behavioral beliefs about IT (e.g., perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use). To test the model, we completed two studies. Study 1 examined users' perceptions of a knowledge portal. Study 2 examined IT professionals' perceptions of KMS. Across studies, our analysis suggests that trust in IT exerts direct effects on behavioral beliefs leading to intentions to explore KMS. Further, when compared to trust in IT support, we found that trust in IT played a more central role in shaping behavioral beliefs leading to exploration of IT. Implications for research and practice are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tem.2009.2028320

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality, helpfulness, and reliability.

    “In contrast, individuals' trust in technology commonly concerns the technology's functionality (i.e., providing features needed to complete a task), its helpfulness (i.e., help functions will provide necessary advice), and its reliability (i.e., technology will consistently operate properly) (McKnight et al. 2011;Thatcher et al. 2010).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2010

  • If a user believes that blockchain better survives malicious attacks because of its decentralized nature, then it is likely that the user perceives this attribute to add to blockchain's trustworthiness and value.

    “Thus, if a user believes that blockchain better survives malicious attacks because of its decentralized nature, then it is likely that the user perceives this attribute to add to blockchain's trustworthiness, and, consequently, its value (Thatcher et al. 2011).”

    From Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin (2020) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thatcher, J. B., McKnight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R. E., & Roberts, N. H.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Virginia Military Institute (US)
  • University of South Carolina Upstate (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
2011-02
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
56-70
ISSN
  • 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0040
OpenAlex
W2136374292
Cited by
196
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
knowledge management systems, technology adoption, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral beliefs, knowledge portal, IT professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review