The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance
Abstract
Sustainability of competitive advantage may be achieved by leveraging unique firm attributes with information technology to realize long-term performance gains. Information systems that cannot sustain competitive impact have only transient strategic value or may offer negative value if matched by a superior response by competitors. A research review of sustainability was conducted that resulted in the development of a framework depicting factors effecting sustainable competitive advantage. This study evaluates longitudinal changes in performance measures of 30 firms that have been cited as “classic" cases of strategic use of information technology. The results of this analysis indicate that not all of these classic cases can be touted as “sustained winners." Differences among strategic “sustainers" and “non-sustainers" were formally tested to determine those firm and/or industry factors that may be antecedents to sustained IT competitive advantage. Results indicate that managers must do more than simply assess the uniqueness or availability of emerging technological innovations in developing strategic IT plans. Specifically, the establishment of technological base along with substantial capital availability seem to be important prerequisites for “technologically derived" sustainability. Recognizing the need for a stronger prescriptive orientation to strategic IS, future research is outlined in an effort to develop a comprehensive framework that would link combinations of sustainability factors to actual performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148626 · Cited by 2,822
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238
The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 · Cited by 919
Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230306 · Cited by 573
Kim, D. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305281619 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. H.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-58
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1561070268
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249609
- The paper
- Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. H. (1994). Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.