The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences
Abstract
Information sytems are strategic business tools, frequently essential to a firm and central to its competitive strategy. Their importance is now acknowledged. But information technology-equipment and services—is available to all firms, and most applications can be duplicated. The copying firm often enjoys the advantages of newer and better technology, learns from the experience of the innovator, and thus can offer comparable services at lower costs. When can an information technology-based strategy confer sustainable competitive advantage? The answer may lie with the role of strategic resources in explaining the allocation of economic benefits from an IT innovation. Specifically, information technology can lead to sustainable competitive advantage when it is used to leverage differences in strategic resources. This may be true even in cases where duplication is relatively easy and there are few dynamic effects, like first-mover advantages, to protect the innovation. An important characteristic of IT is its ability to manage interactions among economic activities; economic theory can be used to establish a link between this characteristic of IT and shifts in resource values. This allows us to identify and examine some opportunities for deploying IT to leverage structural resource differences among firms, including differences in vertical integration and diversification as well as differences in the quality and organization of key resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,381
Teece, D. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,242
Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process
Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466922 · Cited by 5,791
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
How information gives you competitive advantage
Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. A. (1985) · Cited by 4,416
Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies
Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/214762.214766 · Cited by 2,990
Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise
Teece, D. J. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90002-5 · Cited by 1,775
Diversification strategy and profitability
Rumelt, R. P. (1982) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250030407 · Cited by 1,367
Panzar, J. C. (1981) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 949
Cited by
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148626 · Cited by 2,822
Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J.-F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009 · Cited by 2,474
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0045 · Cited by 1,723
How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment?
Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018 · Cited by 1,624
Metadata
- Authors
- Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-292
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2105823940
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249639
- The paper
- Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.