Cited by 1,723Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingDigital Innovation in Industries

Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry

Open access
Zhu, Kevin, Kraemer, Kenneth L.·2005·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Grounded in the innovation diffusion literature and the resource-based theory, this paper develops an integrative research model for assessing the diffusion and consequence of e-business at the firm level. Unlike the typical focus on adoption as found in the literature, we focus on postadoption stages, that is, actual usage and value creation. The model thus moves beyond dichotomous “adoption versus nonadoption” and accounts for the “missing link”—actual usage—as a critical stage of value creation. The model links technological, organizational, and environmental factors to e-business use and value, based on which a series of hypotheses are developed. The theoretical model is tested by using structural equation modeling on a dataset of 624 firms across 10 countries in the retail industry. To probe deeper into whether e-business use and value are influenced by economic environments, two subsamples from developed and developing countries are compared. The study finds that technology competence, firm size, financial commitment, competitive pressure, and regulatory support are important antecedents of e-business use. In addition, the study finds that, while both front-end and back-end capabilities contribute to e-business value, back-end integration has a much stronger impact. While front-end functionalities are becoming commodities, e-businesses are more differentiated by back-end integration. This is consistent with the resource-based theory because back-end integration possesse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1050.0045

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smaller enterprises often lack the requisite resources to be entrepreneurial.

    “Other studies (Hwang et al., 2004;Zhu & Kraemer, 2005;Zhu et al., 2003) emphasize that smaller enterprises often lack the requisite resources to be entrepreneurial.”

    From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Zhu & Kraemer, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2005-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
61-84
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2103371636
Cited by
1,723
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 82
FWCI
69.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
e-business adoption, retail trade, diffusion of innovations, resource-based view, technological competence, firm size, financial commitments, competitive pressure, regulatory support, international technology diffusion, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review