The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems1
Abstract
Current interorganizational systems literature focuses on describing the role of information technology in enabling the transition from interfirm competition to cooperation. This article points out that the promise of IT enabled cooperation, if not nurtured, can degenerate into conflict. The objective of this article is to identify possible risks of conflict in the IOS arena and to suggest strategies for minimizing the likelihood of such conflict. It does so by developing a typology for characterizing IOS along the dimension of interorganization interdependency in interfirm relationships. This typology classifies interorganizational systems into three types: pooled information resource IOS, value/supply chain IOS, and networked IOS. By examining the characteristics of these three types of lOSs the article identifies the economic, technical, and socio-political arguments for potential conflict in these systems. The identification of the risks, in turn, leads to a discussion of possible strategies for containing these risks. The article finally suggests that if the intended benefits of the collaboration are to be realized and sustained, corporate “statesmen” need to nurture the cooperation by anticipating these risks and managing them proactively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
The impact of information systems on organizations and markets
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/99977.99990 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains
Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.008 · Cited by 533
Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-14-36 · Cited by 503
Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks
Herczeg, G., Akkerman, R., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.046 · Cited by 346
The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government
Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240701572913 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, K., & van Dissel, H. G.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-300
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1483421916
- Cited by
- 968
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 62.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.