The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains
Abstract
Research suggests that collaborative supply chain management (SCM) helps chain members create “a rising tide that lifts all boats.” Yet resource dependence theory suggests that when tides rise, some boats are lifted more than others; members who furnish important resources or resources where control is concentrated have bargaining power. Drawing on Thompson [Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw‐Hill, New York], we argue that strong firms’ bargaining power use is tempered by the type of coordination different types of task interdependencies demand. We also investigate how both strong and weak members benefit from SCM. Whereas strong members reap most of the direct benefits, weak members can often gain by building switching costs with strong members, leveraging SCM outside the focal chain, and increasing survival chances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective
Reitz, H. J., Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257794 · Cited by 9,172
DiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
The Population Ecology of Organizations
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226424 · Cited by 7,568
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Emerson, R. M. (1962) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089716 · Cited by 6,265
Cited by
Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner
Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., & Ambrose, E. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12011 · Cited by 342
Kim, D., & Zhu, P. (2018) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.11.002 · Cited by 253
Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective
Mustafa Kamal, M., & Irani, Z. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0491 · Cited by 139
Chen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66
Wang, X., Cai, H., & Florig, H. K. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.044 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-14
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 546-555
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2166443045
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.008
- The paper
- Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007). Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
