The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Factors Associated With Expert Systems Success
Open accessAbstract
As the widespread use and company dependency on expert systems (ES) increase, so does the need to assess their value and to ensure implementation success. This study identifies and empirically tests eight major variables proposed in the literature as determinants of ES success, in this case measured in terms of user satisfaction. IBM's Corporate Manufacturing Expert Systems Project Center collected information from 69 project managers to support the study. The results clearly support the hypothesized relationships and suggest the need for ES project managers to pay special attention to these determinants of ES implementation success. ES success is directly related to the quality of developers and the ES shells used, end-user characteristics, and degree of user involvement in ES development, as each has been defined in this study. For exploratory purposes, the component items for each of these major variables were correlated with the components of user satisfaction. Based on the results, several recommendations are proposed for ES project managers to enhance the likelihood of project success, including: adding problem difficulty as a criterion for ES application selection; increasing ES developer training to improve people skills, having the ability to model and use a systems approach in solving business problems; shaping end-user attitudes and expectations regarding ES; improving the selection of domain experts; more thoroughly understanding the ES impact on end-user jobs; restricting the acquisition of ES shells based on a proposed set of criteria; and ensuring a proper match of ES development techniques and tools to the business problem at hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Cited by
Managing artificial intelligence
Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16274 · Cited by 898
Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036548 · Cited by 470
Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology
Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/s0923-4748(02)00019-x · Cited by 263
Exploring the influence of perceptual factors in the success of web-based spatial DSS
Jarupathirun, S., & Zahedi, F. “. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.024 · Cited by 145
Multiple Conceptualizations of Small Business Web Use and Benefit*
Pflughoeft, K. A., Ramamurthy, K., Soofi, E. S., Yasai‐Ardekani, M., & Zahedi, F. (. (2003) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02539.x · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & O’Neal, Q.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-106
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1574098530
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Factors Associated With Expert Systems Success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249712
- The paper
- Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & O’Neal, Q. (1995). Exploring the Factors Associated With Expert Systems Success. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.