Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

t Tests and Intervals for Comparisons Suggested by the Data

Duncan, David B.·1975·Biometrics

Abstract

SUMMARY The problem of testing a comparison c stuggested by the data is first identified with the mtultiple comparisons problem for the class C of a priori equally plauisible comparisonis. A multiple comparisons dilemma is then illustrated by a simple example E emphasizing the impossibility of developing an acceptable a-level Neyman-Peaison test for c. A recent empirical Bayes additive losses and exchangeable priors (EBALEP) approach is discussed and illutstrated in getting a simple solution for E. A brief review is giveii of the use of the same approach by Waller, Dixon and Dunican in getting the k-ratio t test and interval for the all-pairwise differences problem. These rules are showii to apply to the all contrasts problem as well and several worked examples are given for their application. The k-ratio rtules are seen to have considerably increased power and low type-i error probabilities in dealiing with heterogeneous and near honmogeneous treatments, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2529425

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, D. B.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1975-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
339
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313677237
Cited by
294
References
1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: t Tests and Intervals for Comparisons Suggested by the Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529425
The paper
Duncan, D. B. (1975). t Tests and Intervals for Comparisons Suggested by the Data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529425

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.