The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximum Likelihood Techniques for the Mapping and Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci with the Aid of Genetic Markers
Abstract
A method is presented to estimate the biometric parameters of a quantitative trait locus linked to a genetic marker when both loci are segregating in the F-2 generation of a cross between two inbred lines. The method, which assumes underlying normal distributions, is a combination of maximum likelihood and moments methods and uses the statistics of the genetic marker genotype samples for the quantitative trait to estimate the recombination frequency between the two loci and the means and variances of the genotypes of the quantitative trait locus. With this method, the genetic parameters of a locus affecting plant height linked to an electrophoretic marker for esterase were accurately estimated from a sample of 1596 F-2 progeny of a cross between two species of Lycopersicon (tomato). Linkage distance between the two loci was 38 map units and the effect of the quantitative trait locus was 1.6 phenotypic standard deviation units. Accurate estimates of the genetic parameters and linkage distance for populations of 2000 individuals simulated with a segregating codominant locus with an effect of 1.63 standard deviations linked to a genetic marker with .2 recombination were also derived by this method. The method is not effective in distinguishing between complete and partial linkage in samples of only 500 individuals or for quantitative loci with effects less than a phenotypic standard deviation. The method is more effective for codominant than for dominant loci.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.
Churchill, G. A., & Doerge, R. W. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/138.3.963 · Cited by 4,935
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping.
Jansen, R. C., & Stam, P. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1447 · Cited by 1,046
Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping.
Darvasi, A., & Soller, M. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/141.3.1199 · Cited by 579
Wang, D. L., Zhu, J., Li, Z. K. L., & Paterson, A. H. (1999) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s001220051331 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Weller, J. I.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4302777736
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Likelihood Techniques for the Mapping and Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci with the Aid of Genetic Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2531212
- The paper
- Weller, J. I. (1986). Maximum Likelihood Techniques for the Mapping and Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci with the Aid of Genetic Markers. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.