Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 844

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Utilization of Capture-Mark-Recapture for the Study of Recruitment and Population Growth Rate

Pradel, R.·1996·Biometrics

Abstract

Captorc-mark-recapture data has been cxtensively used fur the study of survival. However, re-cruitment and population growth rat,c can be investigated a? well. The study of recruitment is shown to h r equivalent to the study of survival in reverse and can he carried out by inverting capture histories. The natural parameter in this approach h e r e called seniority probability- is, at each occasion, thr probability of being previously in the population. An ovcrall likelihood is then presented that describes the gains and losties to the population by means of survival and seniority prohabilitics. This likelihood can be easily modified for thr direct stndy of population growt,h rates between occasions. 1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2532908

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 844

Metadata

Authors
Pradel, R.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1996-06
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
703
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966291691
Cited by
844
References
0
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of Capture-Mark-Recapture for the Study of Recruitment and Population Growth Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2532908
The paper
Pradel, R. (1996). Utilization of Capture-Mark-Recapture for the Study of Recruitment and Population Growth Rate. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532908

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.